Rod Rosenstein Just Announced His Resignation

The deputy attorney general will leave the Justice Department on May 11.

J. Scott Applewhite/ZUMA; Mother Jones illustration

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein submitted his letter of resignation to President Donald Trump on Monday, capping a contentious two years that culminated in the release of the Mueller report.

Rosenstein will officially leave the Justice Department on May 11, likely after the Senate has confirmed Jeffrey Rosen as his replacement. In the letter, he does not mention the Mueller report, instead focusing on the department’s political neutrality. 

ā€œPolitical considerations may influence policy choices, but neutral principals must drive decisions about individual cases,ā€ he wrote. ā€œWe enforce the law without fear or favor because credible evidence is not partisan, and truth is not determined by opinion polls. We ignore fleeting distractions and focus our attention on the things that matter, because a republic that endures is not governed by the news cycle.ā€

There were many points over the last two years when Trump appeared ready to fire Rosenstein. On one such occasion last year, he reportedly considered firing Rosenstein, only to order instead that special counsel Robert Mueller be fired; he eventually relented on that demand after the White House counsel, Don McGahn, refused to comply with Trump’s directive. Trump is known to demand loyalty, and he has long been suspicious of Rosenstein. Last summer, Trump complained that Rosenstein is “from Baltimore” and that “there are very few Republicans in Baltimore, if any.” In fact, Rosenstein, who served as a US attorney under both George W. Bush and Barack Obama, is a Republican from Philadelphia and resides in the Washington suburb of Bethesda, Maryland.

Rosenstein’s role overseeing the Russia investigation, which Trump has repeatedly described as a “witch hunt,” made him a target of Trump supporters in Congress and conservative cable news pundits. Last year, Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee released a memo compiled by the staff of committee chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) claiming that the Russia investigation was tainted by FBI misconduct. Rosenstein was widely perceived as a target of the memo, which alleged that the FBI had acted in bad faith when it obtained a surveillance warrant for Trump campaign adviser Carter Page in 2016 and noted that Rosenstein later approved an application to extend that warrant. Intelligence Committee Democrats and national security experts refuted the claim that anything improper had occurred.

Republicans began to turn up the heat on Rosenstein in the spring of 2018. That April, Nunes threatened to impeach Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray if the FBI did not turn over a document used to launch the Russia investigation, which it soon did. Also in April, Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), who heads the conservative Freedom Caucus, threatened to hold Rosenstein in contempt of Congress or to impeach him if the bureau did not rapidly comply with a subpoena from congressional Republicans for records related to Hillary Clinton, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and the FBI’s use of secret surveillance warrants. (Trump personally ordered that documents related to the Russia investigation be released in September. He subsequently amended his demand to allow the Justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General to first review the documents to prevent harm from releasing classified information.)

Trump reportedly again considered removing Rosenstein last year after FBI agents raided the home, office, and hotel room of Trump’s personal attorney, confidant, and fixer, Michael Cohen, who pleaded guilty to eight criminal charges. The raid, which was personally approved by Rosenstein, according to the New York Timesenraged Trump and set off days of speculation that he might fire Rosenstein or Mueller. 

In September, the New York Times reported that the deputy attorney general had discussed mounting an effort to remove Trump from office by invoking the 25th Amendment and had brought up secretly recording the president. Rosenstein denied the report and survived the episode. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate