Human Rights Activists Say These Videos Show Violent Kidnappings—And Facebook Isn’t Taking Them Down

The leader of a camera- and gun-toting border vigilante group was arrested over the weekend.

Members of the United Constitutional Patriots militia group keep an eye on the border in Sunland Park, New Mexico, on April 19, 2019.Roberto E. Rosales/Albuquerque Journal via ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Saturday, the FBI arrested the leader of a vigilante militia group that has been holding border crossers in southern New Mexico at gunpoint. But as of late Tuesday, videos of such apprehensions conducted by his group, United Constitutional Patriots, are still available to view on Facebook, despite apparently violating the company’s content policies.

The disturbing videos depict the group’s vigilante border patrols and show seemingly armed members stopping, questioning, and turning over migrants—often including families with small children—to US Border Patrol.

Change the Terms, a coalition of nonprofits and civil rights groups pushing tech companies to work to reduce hate online, published images of the videos on Twitter on Tuesday, and called for Facebook to take them down. The danger, the coalition argues, is that the videos allow the United Constitutional Patriots to promote illegal activities while growing support and donations. 

The content “violates a number of the provisions in the community standards Facebook has,” says Arusha Gordon, an attorney and co-interim director of the Stop Hate Project at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. Gordon, making detailed reference to the platform’s own content policies, argues the videos violate “their provision on dangerous individuals and organizations, the provision on promoting or publicizing a crime, their provision on coordinating harm, section 3.13 on violence or graphic content. So there’s a whole number of provisions that it raises some serious questions under.”

“The United Constitutional Patriots’ actions raise concerns under both federal and state law and maybe even human rights law,” Gordon added. “Private citizens cannot go around detaining others and holding them captive.”

The videos come from Jim Benvie, a leader of the group. In one, which has garnered 70,000 views and more than 2,500 shares, a group of migrant adults and children sit on the ground with their hands above their heads. “They’re peaceful now because we’ve got them sitting down and under control,” Benvie says during his narration of the two-week-old Facebook Live stream.

Benvie repeatedly refers to the people he encounters in the videos as “invaders” undertaking an “invasion,” and calls for a wall along the southern border. In a video that’s just a week old, Benvie shows members of his group halting hundreds of adults and children, yelling at them to sit down, and demanding they wait for Border Patrol agents. That video has 114,000 views. As of late Tuesday, some videos highlighted by Change the Terms had been removed, though many others flagged by the group in communications with Mother Jones, including those on Benvie’s personal page and in a related Facebook group, still remain. 

The videos were first surfaced by the New York Times, which reported on Friday that the United Constitutional Patriots had detained a group of about 200 immigrants in New Mexico shortly after they crossed the border. The group’s leader, Larry Mitchell Hopkins, who had previously pleaded guilty to impersonating a police officer, was arrested on charges of possession of a firearm by a felon. The Times indicated that the arrest may be the beginning of a larger investigation into the group.

Heidi Beirich, who tracks online hate at the Southern Poverty Law Center, says she first notified Facebook about the videos on Monday but that the company did not respond. Much of the offending content was live video, a feature that Facebook has faced difficulties in effectively moderating, as demonstrated during last month’s shootings in Christchurch, New Zealand.

“You’d think that after the mosque attacks, Facebook would be particularly intent on not getting this kind of stuff out. But I think the truth is they don’t have much of a mechanism to vetting this kind of content,” says Beirich. “People can put something up in any second.”

The ACLU of New Mexico called the militia group’s activities illegal and urged state authorities to investigate them. “We cannot allow racist and armed vigilantes to kidnap and detain people seeking asylum,” the ACLU said in a letter to New Mexico’s governor and attorney general. “We urge you to immediately investigate this atrocious and unlawful conduct.”

While accounts associated with United Constitutional Patriots were removed by PayPal and GoFundMe over the weekend, the group’s Facebook page remains active. Posts on the page continue to solicit donations, asking for checks or money orders to be sent in the mail. The page also posted a link directing users to an account on Square’s Cash App, which is owned by Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey. Square confirmed to Mother Jones that the account was deactivated on Tuesday for violating the platform’s terms of service.

Facebook guidelines prohibit people from using its own Facebook Fundraisers platform if the user is found in violation of community standards. Facebook declined to comment on whether the videos were a violation of community guidelines or if the videos have been deemed criminal activity by law enforcement. 

In March, Facebook announced it was banning white nationalists. The company has also expressed an interest in expanding its team of moderators dealing with domestic extremism. But groups like United Constitutional Patriots have so far evaded bans targeted at domestic extremists, despite the racism and anti-immigrant views espoused by its members.

“Facebook has always said it takes into account action on the platform and off the platform…This is a moment where they need to look at militia groups and extremists beyond Alex Jones,” says Beirich. “These groups can be just as racist against immigrants and Muslims as white supremacist groups.”

Beirich says she fears that a lack of action from Facebook could embolden other extremist groups to use the platform for propaganda or take even more drastic steps to stop migrants. “God help us if somebody else is inspired by this,” she says.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate