Stamping Out Andrew Jackson on the $20 Bill Won’t Be So Easy

A short history of putting political messages on greenbacks

Dano Wall's Harriet Tubman stampDano Wall

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Since 1980, the US government has circulated more than 64 billion pocket-size portraits of a slaveowner, ethnic cleanser, and “Indian killer”. And that’s only a fraction of all the $20 bills printed since President Andrew Jackson’s portrait was first put on them in 1929. The Obama administration attempted to rectify this with a plan to swap out Jackson with abolitionist, Union spy, and Underground Railroad conductor Harriet Tubman. Last week, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said his department wouldn’t get around to putting those redesigned $20s into circulation until 2028. (Coincidentally, President Donald Trump has spoken out about taking Jackson off the bill and has made no secret of his admiration for him.) 

The administration’s decision to postpone the $20 makeover has inspired some Americans to make their own Tubmans. An artist named Dano Wall has been making stamps of Tubman’s face that can be used to blot out Jackson’s on the $20. (After Mnuchin’s announcement, the stamp sold out on Etsy, though you can also make your own.) Wall told the Washington Post that he’d like to get thousands of stamps out there: “If there are 5,000 people consistently stamping currency, we could get a significant percent of circulating $20 bills [with the Tubman] stamp, at which point it would be impossible to ignore.”

Despite the improbability of achieving widespread visibility, the idea of turning greenbacks into vehicles for political messages isn’t new. (It’s illegal to deface US currency, but it seems that no one’s ever been prosecuted for stamping bills.)
In 1976, a numismatician collected a $2 bill stamped “These Are Farm Dollars.” One dollar bills featuring George Washington with a superimposed speech bubble saying “I Grew Hemp” have been around since the ’90s. In 1993, bills stamped “Gay Money” popped up; “Lesbian Money” and “Bisexual Money” were also spotted. After September 11, an artist named David Greg Harth stamped dollar bills “I Am Not Terrorized” and “I Am Not Afraid”; he claims that 1 million were distributed over three years. Stamped messages collected in the 2000s include: “Jews for Clinton,” “Impeach Bush,” and “Stop Starbucks!”

More recent sightings include bills stamped by Obama conspiracy theorists (“Where’s the Birth Certificate?”) and gun owners. The site occupygeorge.com offers templates for printing infographics about income inequality onto bills. “Currency interventions” by artist Joseph DeLappe print rising sea levels and drones on banknotes. You can buy a “Donald Trump Lives Here” stamp meant to be applied to the image of the White House on the back of the $20 bill. (There’s also a “Hillary Clinton Does Not Live Here” version.) 

Most bill-stamping is unorganized and untraceable. That’s part of its appeal, writes Stephen Gencarella Olbrys, an associate professor of communications at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, in a paper on “currency chains”:   

The number of active participants in currency chains cannot be known with certainty. One bill may speak for thousands. Rubber-stamped “Farm Dollars,” “Gay Money,” “Logger’s Money,” “Atheist Money,” or “GUN OWNER$” money, for example, make ambiguous the size of a presumed minority and suggest a legion deserving notice. 

Or, as one DIY stamper tweets, “stamping dollar bills is fun and gets the message out.”  

Occasionally, there are more organized efforts to repurpose cash as political messages, like Ben & Jerry’s cofounder Ben Cohen’s Stamp Stampede, which says it’s enlisted 100,000 Americans to imprint dollar bills with messages promoting voting rights and money in politics (“Not to be Used to Bribe Politicians”).

Yet even a dedicated stamping campaign has to do a lot of work to get noticed. (Stamp Stampede optimistically assumes that every bill is seen by 875 people, and notes that $20 bills circulate more slowly than other denominations.) Let’s say that the Tubman stamp ends up on 1 in 100 bills, making it, as Wall hopes, “impossible to ignore.” That would require 5,000 dedicated stampers to each update $376,000 worth of bills—or one percent of the 9.4 billion Jacksons currently in circulation. Given that the average American carries about $60 in cash, they’d better get stamping.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate