At Big DC Shindig, Trump Courts GOP Fundraisers Who Shunned Him in 2016

The campaign’s message to the fat cats: time to bundle up.

Alex Brandon/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In 2016, Donald Trump ran against Washington insiders and top donors, mocking his opponents for their ties to the establishment and the monied class. In return, deep-pocketed GOP fundraisers largely shunned his campaign. But that’s all in the past now. On Tuesday, when the Trump campaign threw a major donor conference at the president’s Washington, DC, hotel, hundreds of Republican rainmakers showed up, ready to hit up their business and social networks for big-dollar checks for Trump. 

While the donors disappeared into the “Presidential Ballroom” at the Trump International Hotel, a handful of Trump World celebrities wandered through the lobbyā€”Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale ate at the hotel’s steakhouse; Katrina Pierson, a senior adviser and prominent surrogate for the Trump campaign, strolled past the bar; and Trump’s former White House communications director (and former Fox News exec) Bill Shine chatted with guests. 

Invitations to the confab described it as a kickoff event for the Trump Victory Finance Committee, a collaborative effort between the president’s campaign and the Republican National Committee designed to lure in big donors. A key goal of the event was to launch the work of Trump fundraisers known as bundlersā€”financial supporters who not only contribute themselves but who collect large-dollar amounts from associates and friends. This approach to campaign cash-grabbing was originated by the George W. Bush campaign, which dubbed supporters who raised at least $100,000 “pioneers”ā€”and afforded them exalted status in the GOP cosmos. 

According to the Wall Street Journal, which reviewed an informational packet for potential Trump bundlers, raising $100,000 for the president would qualify fundraisers for a “Builders Club” designation that would come with perks such as special briefings and commemorative gifts.

Campaigns do not have to disclose all their bundlers, so some of these Trump underwriters can remain secret. The Federal Election Commission only requires campaigns to publicly report bundlers if they are registered lobbyists. 

Jack Oliver, a co-founder of DC lobbying firm Bryan Cave, told NPR that he would be at the event and was advising the campaign on developing a donor network. (One invited GOP fundraiser described the shindig to Mother Jones as Oliver’s event.) A former national finance chair for the Bush campaign in 2000, Oliver didn’t raise money for Trump in 2016; he is exactly the type of establishment moneyman whose support the Trump campaign is now seeking.

Standing outside the Trump hotel, prominent Republican donor David Flaum, a former chair of the Republican Jewish Coalition and a real estate developer from Rochester, New York, estimated that at least 300 donors were inside for the event, which featured a visit from Vice President Mike Pence and talks from various Trump luminaries, including Kellyanne Conway and Lara Trump. Flaum, who was leaving the conference early to spend time with his family, explained his premature departure: “Iā€™ve heard it all before. I came to show my face and to let people know Iā€™m involved and on the team.ā€ Asked why he was backing Trump, Flaum replied, “Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Jerusalem. When Trump says, ā€˜Never again,’ he means never again.ā€ (He was referring to Trump’s controversial decision to move the US Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.) He also praised Trump’s economic policies, claiming Trump “has succeeded 1000-percent in jobs and wages.”

Flaum noted that in 2016 it was tough to get prominent and wealthy Republicans to cut checks for Trump’s campaign. But that’s all changed. “When I call people now, they canā€™t wait to give,” he said. 

Asked if there was a suggested amount for attendees at Tuesday’s event to donate or bring in, he shook his head: “No, but these people will raise a lot.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate