Devin Nunes’ 2020 Reelection Bid May Have Just Gotten a Lot Easier

His 2018 challenger, Fresno’s Andrew Janz, is running for mayor instead.

Andrew Janz (left) and Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.)Mother Jones illustration

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In 2018, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) found himself in the reelection race of his life when Democratic challenger Andrew Janz, a 34-year-old Fresno prosecutor, launched a powerful grassroots campaign against him. Janz raised $9 million in the process, drawing national attention to his bid to unseat one of President Donald Trump’s main enablers in the House. Nunes won by just five points, the closest heā€™d ever come to being toppled from his Central Valley congressional post.

Since then, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee put Nunes on an early-target list for 2020, and speculation rose that Janz, perhaps with stronger DCCC backing, would run against Nunes again in 2020 to try to finish what he’d started. That speculation ended Thursday when Janz announced his intentions to take on Lee Brand, the mayor of Fresno, rather than run against Nunes in California’s 22nd Congressional District.

ā€œWhat I learned during the congressional race is that Nunes has a lot of power in the Central Valley,ā€ Janz told me. ā€œI think that power is derived from this kingdom that he has created with a lot of local elected political officials, one of which is Lee Brand, the mayor of Fresno.ā€

Successfully taking on Nunes isnā€™t going to happen overnight, or perhaps not even over the course of one or two election seasons, Janz said. ā€œTo change the mindset of folks here in the Central Valley, we have to start going after some of these folks who are lower on the totem pole and really attack GOP political infrastructure at its core,” he said. “My decision was based in part on this idea that the fight against Devin Nunes is going to be a long-term one, and I think that we first need to lay the groundwork politically here in the Central Valley before we can make that a reality.ā€

The 2018 campaign brought a host of Nunesā€™ antics to light. He was crowned Trumpā€™s most ardent ā€œdefender-in-chiefā€ and likened to the bumbling Inspector Clouseau for his failed political stuntsā€”recall his ā€œmidnight runā€ to the White House and his much-hyped, poorly sourced memoā€”leading another associate to call him ā€œan overeager goofball.ā€ Then there was his war on the press, during which he attacked the Fresno Bee as the Central Valleyā€™s ā€œpropaganda machineā€ in a glossy, 38-page mailer and told a Bee reporter that he felt ā€œbad for the people who work at the Beeā€ because itā€™s ā€œsad.ā€

What hopes the Democrats had of toppling the congress member who made a name for himself by running interference for Trump may now be stalled. ā€œAndrew Janz represented the Democratic Partyā€™s best shot at Nunesā€™ seat, and since he fell short, that may dissuade other potential challengers from going down that road,ā€ said Thomas Holyoke, a professor of political science at Fresno State University.

Holyoke noted that in every previous reelection effort, Nunes ā€œdispatched his opponentsā€ handily. ā€œHeā€™s considered pretty safe in that seat. It has heavy Republican registration. I think something highly unusual would have to happen to make that seat vulnerable,ā€ he said.

As Janz well knows, the dynamics of the district are in Nunesā€™ favor. ā€œI laid out a detailed plan for how I thought we could get more water and water storage here in the Central Valley, a traditionally sort of Republican position,ā€ Janz said. ā€œI supported Proposition 3, which would have generated $700 million worth of water projects in the Central Valley. I was in favor of that water bond; Nunes was against it. But youā€™d drive down Highway 99 and youā€™d see a sign supporting Devin Nunes, and right next to it a Proposition 3 sign. For a lot of folks, I think, they couldnā€™t move past the notion that a Democrat can actually be better on economic and infrastructure issues for the Central Valley. Thatā€™s something weā€™re going to have to push back on.”

Just because Janz wonā€™t be running, doesnā€™t mean the Democrats have given up on the seat. Janz said he has been working with the DCCC to recruit candidates. In an emailed statement, DCCC spokesman Andy Orellana said, ā€œAs the 2018 Midterm elections showed in CA-22, Congressman Nunes is vulnerable and Democrats will not give him a pass in 2020 as he puts Trumpā€™s misplaced priorities over the needs of his districtā€¦Voters in CA-22 will remember come Election Day that Nunes stands with special interests and Washington insiders instead of hard working Californians.ā€

Believing that, however, will take some convincing. ā€œI donā€™t see it happening myself,ā€ Holyoke said. ā€œAnd I think Janz doesnā€™t see it either.ā€

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate