Georgia Governor Brian Kemp Just Banned Abortions After Six Weeks. Black Female Lawmakers Aren’t Having It.

“What you saw earlier today was men speaking for the women and the families of Georgia. If that’s not a problem, then I don’t know what is.”

From left, women of the Georgia House Democratic Caucus Rep. Renitta Shannon, D-Decatur, Rep. Erica Thomas, D-Austell, Rep. Park Cannon, D-Atlanta, and Rep. Sandra Scott, D-Rex, hold a news conference in opposition to the signing of the heartbeat abortion bill. Bob Andres/Associated Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Georgia’s Republican Governor Brian Kemp signed a law Tuesday banning abortions after six weeks, before many women even know they are pregnant. One of the most restrictive abortion laws in the country, HB 481 has proved controversial since it was first introduced in February and Kemp’s signing immediately sparked outcry from female lawmakers in the state, many of whom made news in the past few months for their own legislative proposals clapping back at their male colleagues. 

Following a protest rally led by Planned Parenthood at the State Capitol Tuesday, a group of black female lawmakers held a press conference vowing to fight back in the courts and at the polls.

“I chose life for my children and my unborn child right now, but…I am not in every household of thousands and thousands of Georgians that want to make that choice for themselves,” Rep. Erica Thomas said, standing alongside three of her peers. “What you saw earlier today was men speaking for the women and the families of Georgia. If that’s not a problem, then I don’t know what is.”

Rep. Park Cannon, the youngest woman in the Georgia general assembly, also spoke and identified herself as “one of the women who have had abortions.”

Other voices leading the charge against the bill chimed in on social media. Rep. Dar’shun Kendrick called the legislation a “death warrant for women in Georgia by making safe abortion illegal” in a tweet, while Rep. Renitta Shannon and Sen. Jen Jordan also sounded the alarm. Former gubernatorial candidate and Democratic party stars Stacey Abrams and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez weighed in, too. 

Many of the same black female lawmakers who held the press conference Tuesday have been fighting the bill for months, speaking movingly on the floor of the Capitol and, in an action that drew national attention, introducing legislation that would amend the state code to require men 55 and older to “immediately report to the county sheriff or local law enforcement agency when such male releases sperm from his testicles.”

The same day that legislation was introduced in March, Rep. Kendrick talked about introducing “testicular ‘bill of rights'”—an idea that went viral:

Also in March, when the heartbeat bill came up for a vote in the House, Rep. Shannon spoke in protest until she was physically removed from the podium:

Then, after the legislation passed the House, Rep. Thomas gave a stark warning to Gov. Kemp: “I’m done with these people, and I feel like we have to do something to make a change. And if I have to stand outside as a pregnant woman…of the governor’s office, I will stand outside, and I will get my chair, and I will rally around because you do not need to sign this bill,” she said. “You sign this bill, you are done.”

A speech from Sen. Jordan that month also went viral—in which she shared deeply personal details about her own difficulties with pregnancy. “I have seen what many of you in here have called a heartbeat 10 times. But I have only given birth twice. I have lost seven pregnancies in varying points of time before 20 weeks and one after five months. Her name was Juliette,” she said. “Someone came up and said ‘who speaks for the unborn, who represents the unborn?’ I will tell you. Their mothers do.”

Georgia is the fourth state in 2019 to enact a heartbeat abortion bill. While these bans aren’t new, before this year, they “were rarely enacted,” according to the Guttmacher Institute.

“States pushing radical abortion bans that are clearly in violation of Roe v. Wade is part of a deliberate strategy to advance these cases to the U.S. Supreme Court, in hopes that an increasingly conservative Court will undermine or even overturn Roe,” Elizabeth Nash, the senior state issues manager at Guttmacher Institute, said in a statement Monday. “The surge in attempts to ban abortion in the earliest stages of pregnancy underscores that the end goal of anti-abortion politicians and activists is to ban all abortion.”

None of the bans signed into law so far are currently in effect due to later enactment dates or legal challenges. The Georgia bill would go into effect January 1, 2020, but the ACLU and Planned Parenthood have already signaled they will take the bill to court. 

It seems likely state lawmakers will continue the fight, too. “Whether they know it or not, this is an attack on all women,” Rep. Shannon said at the press conference Tuesday. “All miscarriages will be subject to suspicion of criminality, and instead of seeking immediate care, women will be weighing if seeking care could mean being criminalized. Black and brown women will be disproportionately criminalized. This bill is not pro-life, but a death sentence for women whose viability of life is uncontested.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate