The First Big Democratic Primary Challenge of 2020 Is Happening In Massachusetts

Labor lawyer Shannon Liss-Riordan is going up against Green New Deal co-author Sen. Ed Markey

Shannon Liss-Riordan speaks to reporters in AprilBill Green/Boston Globe/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Labor lawyer Shannon Liss-Riordan announced this week that she is running for the U.S. Senate, challenging incumbent Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey in next year’s Democratic primary race.

Markey was first elected to the House of Representatives in 1976 and moved to the Senate in 2013, after winning a special election to replace John Kerry, who had stepped down to become Secretary of State. With the exception of a 2013 primary to succeed Kerry, the last time Markey faced a Democratic challenger was 2002.

Liss-Riordan, a longtime labor lawyer who has successfully battled major companies like FedEx and American Airlines on behalf of workers, has gained national media attention in the last several years thanks to a slew of lawsuits she’s filed against major tech companies, including Uber and Lyft. Her suits have challenged the companies’ practice of classifying workers, from drivers to cleaners, as independent contractors instead of full employees. The common money-saving practice allows multi-million dollar gig economy companies to forgo paying for a number of worker benefits, including workersā€™ compensation, unemployment, and Social Security.

In 2015, I met with Liss-Riordan at her Boston office for a story about her legal fights agains Silicon Valley, where she spoke about what motivated her to file such lawsuits:

ā€œThese companies save massively by shifting many costs of running a business to the workers, profiting off the backs of their workers,ā€ Liss-Riordan says with calm intensity as she sits in her Boston office, which is peppered with framed posters of Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren. The bustling block below is home to two coffee chains that Liss-Riordan has sued. If the Uber case succeeds, she tells me, ā€œmaybe that will make companies think twice about steamrolling over laws.ā€

She also spoke about the legal arguments made by tech companies, and how they’ve compared to what she’s seen in other industries:

When she litigated similar cases on behalf of cleaning workers, the cleaning companies claimed they were simply connecting broom-pushing ā€œindependent franchisesā€ with customers. When she won several landmark cases brought by exotic dancers who had been misclassified as contractors, the strip clubs argued that they were ā€œbars where you happen to have naked women dancing,ā€ Liss-Riordan recounts with a wry smile. ā€œThe court said, ā€˜No. People come to your bar because of that entertainment. Adult entertainment. Thatā€™s your business.’ā€

Uberā€™s argument is pretty similar to that of the strip clubs. ā€œUber is obviously a car service,ā€ she says, and to insist otherwise is ā€œto deny the obvious.ā€ An Uber spokesperson wouldnā€™t address that characterization, but said that drivers ā€œlove being their own bossā€ and ā€œuse Uber on their own terms: they control their use of the app, choosing when, how and where they drive.ā€

Some observers have suggested creating a new job category between employee and contractor. But Liss-Riordan is tired of hearing that labor laws should adapt to accommodate upstart tech companies, not the other way around: ā€œWhy should we tear apart laws that have been put in place over decades to help a $50 billion company like Uber at the expense of workers who are trying to pay their rent and feed their families?ā€

Liss-Riordan’s primary challenge comes on the heels of freshman Rep. Ayanna Pressley’s (D-Mass.) victory in the 2018 midterm elections, where she ousted 10-term incumbent Rep. Michael Capuano. In an email to supporters this week, Liss-Riordan explained that her work as a labor lawyer inspired her Senate run.

“I have spent the last 20 years as a workers’ rights attorney, fighting alongside those who have been taken advantage of by their employers,” she wrote. “The cases I have foughtā€”for tipped workers, employees misclassified as independent contractors, and low wage workersā€”have made me realize just how much the rich and powerful have reshaped our country to benefit them. They have been writing the rules for too longā€”we need to make a change.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate