The Trump Administration Wants Funding to Shelter Twice as Many Migrant Children

A new emergency request would let the administration keep up to 23,600 children at government shelters.

Children and workers at a now closed Health and Human Services tent encampment in Tornillo, Texas, in June.Joe Raedle/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Even the Trump administration agrees that children who arrive at the border alone should live with parents or relatives in the United States while their immigration cases are decided rather than stay in government shelters. Department of Health and Human Services assistant secretary Lynn Johnson put it bluntly in an interview with National Public Radio last year: “The government makes lousy parents.”

Yet last May, after Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers shifted tactics, the number of kids in the government’s custody quickly climbed to a record high of more than 14,000. And now, as children remain in shelters that contract with HHS for far more time than they used to, the Trump administration is asking Congress to provide emergency funding so that it can shelter up to 23,600 migrant children at a time.

On Wednesday, the Trump administration requested $4.5 billion of emergency funding to address what it called an “immediate humanitarian crisis” at the southern border. Nearly two-thirds of that money—$2.88 billion—would go to sheltering children who cross the border without their parents. Unlike single adults and families whom the Department of Homeland Security is responsible for, unaccompanied children must be transferred to HHS’s Office of Refugee Resettlement. (ORR is not an immigration enforcement agency and is tasked with protecting children’s welfare.)

The administration is also requesting an additional $341 million so that Immigration and Customs Enforcement can detain more adults and families. The request comes less than three months after Congress told ICE to significantly cut the number of immigrants it detains.

Evelyn Stauffer, an HHS spokeswoman, said in a statement that the emergency funding is needed to address a “dramatic spike” in the number of children being sent to HHS after being stopped at the border. It’s true that ORR is on pace to take a record number of unaccompanied children into custody this year—but not by a margin that would require keeping nearly 24,000 children at its shelters. The bigger shift under Trump is that unaccompanied children are remaining in government custody for longer than they used to: Between 2016 and 2018, the average length of time children spent in ORR custody increased from 38 days to 60 days.

Why the longer stays? Children are usually released from government custody after parents or close relatives come forward to sponsor them. Last May, HHS and DHS entered into an information-sharing agreement that made it easier for those sponsors to be arrested if they were found to be undocumented. In June, HHS began fingerprinting all adults living in the homes of potential sponsors of unaccompanied children. The two changes are what likely caused the increase in custody times. By December, when HHS abandoned the household-wide fingerprinting requirement so that children could be released to sponsors more quickly, the number of children in government shelters had reached a record high of nearly 15,000. In 2015, ORR could hold fewer than 8,000 children at a time. 

In February, Congress blocked the Trump administration from arresting sponsors identified through the information-sharing agreement. Children have gone from spending an average of 89 days in government shelters between October and December to 66 days between January and March, according to HHS spokesman Kenneth Wolfe. In April, HHS Secretary Alex Azar told Congress that his department had been releasing children more quickly recently, even though it was dealing with an increase in Guatemalan teenagers, who were harder to release because they were less likely to have relatives in the United States.

Even so, HHS’s 2019 budget requested that Congress provide up to $200 million in new “contingency” funding if the department needed to take care of more unaccompanied children than expected. This March, the department asked Congress for about $740 million in its 2020 budget request, citing “the historical, significant variability in program needs.” Just over a month later, the Trump administration is asking for $2.8 billion to cover a seven-month period.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate