Alabama’s Top Elections Official Thinks Voting Shouldn’t Be Easy. Now He’s Running for Senate.

John Merrill says he will supervise his own election.

Alabama Secretary of State John Merrill speaks to the media after a special Senate election on December 12, 2017, in Montgomery. Brynn Anderson/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

John Merrill, Alabama’s Republican secretary of state who made national headlines in 2016 by asserting that registering to vote and casting a ballot should not be easy, declared his candidacy for the US Senate on Tuesday. Merrill said Tuesday that he would not resign his post during the campaign, meaning he will oversee the rules and procedures governing his own raceā€”a potential conflict of interest between his duties as an election official and his priorities as a candidate.

Merrill made his inflammatory comments during the filming of a documentary in 2016. Filmmaker Brian Jenkins asked Merrill why he opposed automatically registering voters when they turned 18. Merrill responded that civil rights heroes like Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) and Martin Luther King Jr. “foughtā€”some of them were beaten, some of them were killedā€”because of their desire to ensure that everybody that wanted to had the right to register to vote and participate in the process. Iā€™m not going to cheapen the work that they did. Iā€™m not going to embarrass them by allowing somebody thatā€™s too sorry to get up off of their rear to go register to vote.”

He continued: “Just because you turned 18 doesn’t give you the right to do anything.” As many people pointed out at the time, the 26th Amendment to the Constitution does in fact grant citizens who have turned 18 the right to vote. 

Now, Merrill will oversee his own election as he runs in the 2020 GOP primaryā€”against former judge Roy Moore, whose allegations of sexual assault against minors derailed his 2017 campaign against Jones, as well as Alabama Rep. Bradley Byrne and three other contendersā€”and then possibly the general election against Democratic Sen. Doug Jones. The situation is part of a growing trend of highly partisan secretaries of state running for higher office while remaining their state’s elections chief. Last year, Brian Kemp in Georgia and Kris Kobach in Kansas both did so in tight gubernatorial races. Kemp’s race was filled with last-minute accusations against Democrats and policy decisions that benefited his own candidacy.

Merrill, as a state senator and secretary of state, has been part of a movement, sweeping GOP-controlled states in recent years, to make it more difficult to voteā€”a value he seemed to defend in the 2016 documentary. As a state senator, he co-sponsored a strict voter ID law for the state; among other provisions, it required ID for absentee voting, which is used disproportionately by rural black voters. As secretary of state, he supported closing DMVs across the state in a plan that would disproportionately hit African American-majority counties where it would be more difficult to get an ID needed to vote.

In October 2017, shortly before the December special Senate election between Jones and Moore, Merrill accused nearly 700 voters of illegally voting in both the Democratic primary and the Republican runoff and threatened to prosecute themā€”allegations that voting rights advocates saw as a scare tactic aimed at deterring minority voters. A month later, Merrill’s office identified 140 people who had done this “crossover” voting, which had just been prohibited under a new and little-publicized law. None of the 140 voters were recommended for prosecution by local probate judges, and Merrill declined to pursue any prosecutions. But the episode shows the potential for an elections chief overseeing his own election to sow discord and fear right before voters head to the polls.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate