Where Is Bernie Sanders’ Climate Plan?

Activists want more info from Sanders’ 2020 campaign.

Cliff Owen, AP

When the Sunrise Movement held the last stop on its Green New Deal tour in Washington, DC in May, Bernie Sanders was the understated star act. A crowd of 1,500 people at Howard University gave the 2020 candidate a standing ovation even before he began his stump speech about the climate crisis. The Vermont Senator’s speech to a younger generation of activists echoed his typical 2016 and 2020 platform points, calling for the elimination of trillions in oil and gas industry tax breaks and creating worker protections under a Green New Deal.

Following Sanders’ act was the newest star in the progressive movement, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who obliquely criticized a campaign advisor for former Vice President Joe Biden, who told Reuters that Biden would look for a “middle ground” solution to climate change. “I will be damned if the same politicians who refused to act then are going to try to come back today and say we need to find a middle-of-the-road approach to save our lives,” Ocasio-Cortez said.

Only two weeks later, Biden released a climate change plan that bumped up his position on the environmental group Greenpeace’s scorecard, from near-failing to a “B”, mostly on the strength of the plan’s commitment to clean energy investments, path to net-zero emissions, and international leadership. He joined six other candidates who have now released a detailed platform explaining their vision for climate change, including Elizabeth Warren, Beto O’Rourke, John Delaney, Michael Bennet, John Hickenlooper, and Jay Inslee, who’s centered his campaign around the issue.

The notable exception in this group? Bernie Sanders, one of the frontrunners who still hasn’t released his own plan. This fact hasn’t gone unnoticed by Greenpeace or other climate activists agitating for a robust policy discussion, especially with climate ranking as a leading concern among Democratic primary voters.

The silence has left many activists wondering where the senator has been when they hoped to see their longtime ally lead a robust and comprehensive discussion. 

“Sen. Sanders needs to align his campaign with his track record in the Senate and release his vision for what he would do as President to tackle the climate crisis,” says David Turnbull of the advocacy group Oil Change U.S. “We know he has bold ideas and sincere concern; it’s critical he lay those out and contribute his ideas to the debate.”

The candidate scorecard from Greenpeace also knocked down Sanders’ grade, so that he’s in third place after Sen. Cory Booker and Inslee, for not yet calling “for a full, managed phase-out of the fossil fuel industry” in a detailed plan. “We’re waiting with bated breath for the senator’s climate plan to articulate what his ambitions are moving forward,” says Janet Redman, Greenpeace’s Climate Campaign Director. 

According to environmentalists familiar with the discussions, the senator has been working on an answer since last winter. His Senate office has been laying the groundwork for a comprehensive proposal on a Green New Deal, collecting input from climate activists like Sunrise, the think tank New Consensus, and environmental justice advocates.  

Where is it? On the eve of Sanders’ first debate of this election, there still was no specific timeline yet for its release. “It’s still in progress,” a spokesperson from Sanders’ Senate office told me, “and we intend have it out shortly…the process is slow,” and there has been “consultation with a lot of stakeholders and activists.”

Sanders could point to his robust legislative record, of course. Gearing up for his first presidential run when Sanders was emphasizing his edge on climate concerns over Hillary Clinton, he sponsored a series of bills in 2015 including the Clean Energy Worker Just Transition Act that focuses on a clean energy training and investments for struggling Appalachian workers, the End Polluter Welfare Act closing $130 billion in fossil fuel tax breaks over the next decade, and the Climate Protection and Justice Act that sets a price on carbon to cut emissions 80 percent by 2050 (a general target progressive climate activists now have argued would do too little). He’s been a cosponsor, along with several of his fellow Senate presidential candidates, on plenty of other ideas that have grown more mainstream in the Democratic Party, including Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley’s Keep it In the Ground Act focusing on fossil fuel production, and the 100 by ’50 Act to reach 100 percent renewable energy by 2050.

It’s not like he is avoiding the issue on the campaign trail, either: In a recent speech laying out his vision for democratic socialism, Sanders called for a bill of rights that includes a right to a clean environment, embracing an idea that is gaining ground in bills introduced locally. 

Still, the candidate hasn’t presented a systematic and comprehensive vision that threads the needle on climate solutions across the economy, especially on how to exploit the existing powers of the executive branch. He’s embraced the Green New Deal, certainly, calling for one to “save American families money and generate millions of jobs by transforming our energy system” on his campaign website.

“He’s been extremely good throughout the years in criticizing and raising awareness about the problem. In 2016, some people felt that he was not as strong in providing solutions,” says R.L. Miller, founder of the PAC Climate Hawks Vote. “Now that he’s one of the frontrunners, it is incumbent on him to provide solutions, especially because the Green New Deal was not mentioned at all in last night’s debate. I am very anxious to read his Green New Deal bill or climate proposal.” 

In past cycles, Sanders’ less visible role in the ideas race around climate would be easily eclipsed by his focus on health care and good-paying jobs. His robust legislative record would suffice. And maybe, when the time comes for his substantive Green New Deal paper, he’ll fill a void with the coherent vision climate activists were hoping for in the first place.

But in 2019, many voters have been hungry for more. Climate change has ranked as a top issue for Democratic primary voters in poll after poll. Two of the top three frontrunners have also come out early with a plan, or multiple plans, to burnish their climate credentials. A long-shot candidate has staked his entire bid around the issue. 

Climate activists aren’t questioning Sanders’ commitment, but some have begun to question whether he is leading on the issue in the 2020 race. 

Greenpeace’s Redman knows from the 2016 campaign that Sanders is committed to a clean energy economy and making sure workers are brought along in the transition.  “But it’s not just about the clean energy economy, it’s all about the science driving down fossil fuels,” she says. “We’re missing a whole side of that conversation except in Gov. Inslee’s fossil fuels plan. It’s great we have it, but we need more than one candidate to be talking about what is such a critical issue. We’re hoping Sen. Sanders will add to the conversation.” 

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate