Doctors, Lawyers, and One Celebrity Just Gave Republicans the Abortion Education They’ve Needed

“Although I play a doctor on television, sir,” Busy Philipps said, “I am actually not a physician.”

From left to right: Professor Melissa Murray, actress Busy Philipps, and doctor Owen PhillipsTom Williams/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The House Judiciary Committee held a hearing on threats to reproductive rights Tuesday. This follows a spate of new laws restricting abortion access that have been recently passed in state legislatures emboldened by the conservative majority in the Supreme Court. For two hours, lawmakers heard from physicians and legal experts explaining the need for safe and legal access to abortion, while others from the anti-abortion movement emphasized the value of the new laws. 

Dr. Yashica Robinson, an ob/gyn who provides abortion care in Alabama, spoke out against the state’s recent near-total ban on abortion, which threatens to send abortion providers to prison for 99 years. “HB 314 is blatantly unconstitutional, and would force doctors like me to choose between what is ethically, medically appropriate care, and being criminalized,” she said. “There is no other area of medicine where we have legislation threatening physicians with criminal prosecutions for simply doing their job.”

Melissa Murray, an NYU law professor and a former clerk of Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, said that the Supreme Court has consistently upheld the constitutional right to an abortion since Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973. “Despite these longstanding precedents, state legislatures have continued to test the constitution’s limits by enacting increasingly restrictive abortion laws,” Murray said. “They purport to promote and protect women’s health, but in fact, these laws are part of a larger effort to legislate abortion out of existence through piecemeal attacks.”

Murray went on the describe the ways that reduced access to reproductive rights disproportionately harms marginalized communities, who often must travel great distances for care, or who are unable to afford childcare or time off from work during mandatory waiting periods before abortion procedures.

Actress and reproductive rights advocate Busy Philipps also testified. She spoke of the outpouring of support she received after opening up about her abortion on her late-night talk show, and she stressed the importance of removing the stigma around abortion discussions.

The panel also included two representatives from the anti-abortion movement. Christina Bennett, a pro-life advocate and Christian minister, said that when her mother was pregnant with her, she decided to go through with the pregnancy despite pressure from her father and a physician to have an abortion. Melissa Ohden, a self-proclaimed “feminist for life” said that she was the survivor of her mother’s failed attempt at an abortion. Ohden was born live after her mother received a saline abortion—a rare form of late-term abortion.

“I am alive today because someone else’s reproductive right failed to end my life,” Ohden said.

After Ohden’s testimony, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) turned not to Dr. Owen Phillips, an ob/gyn and professor at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center, but to actress Busy Philipps, who was seated to her right. 

Gohmert asked Philipps if “somebody who has survived an abortion like Melissa Ohden” also had a right to control over her body.

“Although I play a doctor on television, sir, I am actually not a physician,” Philipps replied, to laughter from the audience.

Watch the entire hearing below.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate