House Democrats Hold Trump Officials in Contempt for Withholding Census Documents

The attorney general and commerce secretary have refused to provide key documents about why they added a citizenship question to the 2020 census

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross testifies about the census during a House Oversight Committee hearing on March 14.Jose Luis Magana/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The House Oversight Committee voted on Wednesday to hold Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in contempt of Congress for withholding key documents about why the Trump administration added a controversial question about citizenship to the 2020 census. The resolution passed by a vote of 24-15, with every Democrat and Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) voting for it. It recommends that the House of Representatives begin civil and criminal proceedings to enforce subpoenas authorized by the committee in April. Prior to the vote, President Donald Trump invoked executive privilege to shield the documents the committee is requesting from public view, escalating the administration’s battle with House Democrats.

The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the legality of the citizenship question later this month, but the Oversight Committee has launched its own investigation into how the question was added to the 2020 census. Democrats accuse Barr and Ross of failing to provide key documents that would shed light on the origins of the question. Even in the absence of those documents, statements from administration officials and newly discovered files have revealed that Ross and other officials lied about the reasons for adding the question, which was actually intended to suppress the influence of Latinos and other minority groups and give Republicans a political boost. Oversight Chairman Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) has called the administration’s actions “one of the most unprecedented cover-ups since Watergate.” Now, House Democrats are hoping to put pressure on the administration to release the documents or to get a federal court to order their release. 

These documents include unredacted emails between Ross and his staff; secret memos from the Commerce Department, which oversees the Census Bureau, to the Justice Department; and draft copies of the letter the Justice Department sent to Commerce requesting the addition of the question. Committee Chair Elijah Cummings also said that Barr personally blocked John Gore, the Justice Departmentā€™s former assistant attorney general for civil rights who drafted the letter requesting the question, from answering questions before the committee.

“What we have learned so far in this investigation is quite disturbing,” Cummings said at the hearing. He called Trump’s invocation of executive privilege “another example of the Trump administrationā€™s blanket defiance of Congressā€™ constitutionally-mandated responsibilities.” He added, “This begs the question: What is being hidden?”

Ross said he approved the addition of the citizenship question in March 2018 after the Justice Department requested it in order to better enforce the Voting Rights Act. But evidence released at the federal trial and during the committeeā€™s investigation has contradicted Rossā€™ claims. Ross, not the Justice Department, first lobbied for the addition of the question, and he discussed it with top figures at the White House, including Steve Bannon, despite initially claiming otherwise. In late May, newly uncovered documents revealed that Tom Hofeller, the GOPā€™s longtime gerrymandering mastermind, had written a memo finding that a citizenship question would be ā€œadvantageous to Republicans and Non-Hispanic Whites.ā€ The documents also showed that Hofeller had ghostwritten part of the Justice Departmentā€™s letter requesting the question. Hofeller told Trump administration officials to say that the question was needed to enforce the Voting Rights Act, even though his research had already concluded that it would reduce the political influence of Latinos and other minority groups.

A report from Oversight Committee Democrats accompanying the contempt resolution says that the administration has ā€œobstructed and delayed the Committeeā€™s investigation.ā€ Last week, Cummings released a memo showing that the White House had ordered Kris Kobach, the former Kansas secretary of state and vice chair of Trump’s now-defunct election integrity commission, not to answer questions from the committee. Kobach talked to the committee anyway on May 21 and said he had discussed adding a citizenship question with the Trump campaign during the 2016 election and had met with Trump, Bannon, and thenchief of staff Reince Preibus shortly after the inauguration to follow up on the idea, further undercutting Rossā€™ account of how the question was approved. Kobach, the leading architect of laws restricting immigration and ballot access, then wrote to Ross in July 2017 ā€œat the direction of Steve Bannonā€ and said it was ā€œessentialā€ that the citizenship question be added to the census.

ā€œI want to know why this question was magically added after we have seen that a political operative knew and detailed an intent to intimidate racial and immigrant communities for a partisan purpose, saying this will hurt Democrats and help Republicans,ā€ Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y) said at the hearing. ā€œI want to know why people like Kris Kobach, with a rĆ©sumĆ© of voter suppression techniques in the state of Kansasā€”I want to know why folks like that have their fingerprints all over the most sensitive census operations that we have as a government. This determines who has power in the United States of America.ā€

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate