Protesters Want Mayor Pete to Address Racial Violence in His Hometown. On the Campaign Trail, He’s Dodging the Issue.

“It’s time for you to do something,” mother of man killed by South Bend police tells Buttigieg.

Democratic presidential candidate and South Bend mayor Pete Buttigieg speaks during a forum on Friday, June 21, 2019, in Miami.Brynn Anderson

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In one of his first appearances back on the campaign trail since a white police officer shot and killed a black man in his city, South Bend mayor and 2020 Democratic hopeful Pete Buttigieg addressed the violence before a crowd of Democrats in South Carolina, an early primary state with a large black population.

Buttigieg had spent the last week back in South Bend after Sgt. Ryan O’Neill shot and killed 54-year-old Eric Logan while responding to a call about someone breaking into vehicles. Logan reportedly had a knife, and O’Neill fired when Logan proceeded to walk towards him. Court documents obtained by HuffPost suggest the officer had a history of making racist comments.

Buttigieg reserved judgement when he spoke at the South Carolina Democrats’ State Convention in Columbia on Saturday. “It’s like one member of our family died at the hands of another,” Buttigieg said. The South Bend mayor also declined to directly confront the racial elements of the death. “We already know why such deep wounds are surfacing, why our whole community hurts,” Buttigieg said, adding that South Bend “is full of people who believe in safety and justice.”

How Buttigieg addressed the shooting would be under heavy scrutiny during his appearance today in South Carolina, where more than a quarter of the early primary state’s population is black. Buttigieg drew criticism earlier this year when a 2015 speech surfaced showing the mayor had said “all lives matter,” a phrase often invoked as a racist rebuttal to the Black Lives Matter movement. (Buttigieg said he stopped using the phrase once he learned what it symbolized.)

But several instances of racial discrimination within South Bend’s police department have called into question how well Buttigieg has addressed racial unrest as the mayor of a city that is 26 percent black. Before Buttigieg departed for the Palmetto State, marchers confronted him and South Bend police chief Scott Ruszkowski on Friday evening, demanding that the city’s leaders fire police officers and require those that remain to complete additional training.

According to the South Bend Tribune, Shirley Newbill, the mother of the slain man, told Buttigieg to take action swift action to address the protesters’ concerns.  “I have been here all my life, and you have not done a damn thing about me or my son or none of these people out here,” she said. “It’s time for you to do something.”

For all of his subtlety in describing the situation on his own backyard, Buttigieg didn’t shy away from addressing other instances of racial violence. He made a direct attack on the deadly “rising tide of white nationalism,” calling attention to the 2015 shooting at a predominantly African American church in Charleston, South Carolina, that left nine dead. 

In his stump speech, Buttigieg also made a kitchen table appeal to black voters. He referred to his “Douglass Plan” for promoting economic prosperity among African Americans, which he announced in advance of his appearance at the Black Economic Alliance presidential candidate forum last Sunday. The proposal, named for the abolitionist Frederick Douglass, calls for, among other measures, tripling the number of entrepreneurs in underserved communities over 10 years, reducing the American prison population by 50 percent, and increasing the rate of federal contracts awarded to minority and women-owned businesses.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate