Sanders and Warren Have Very Different Plans to Fix Student Debt

Here’s what they would do.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) holds a news conference to discuss his college affordability legislation in Washington on Monday June 24, 2019.Caroline Brehman/CQ Roll Call via AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Bernie Sanders just took his long-running war against the high cost of college to a whole new level: He’s introducing a bill to cancel all $1.6 trillion outstanding student debt, providing instant relief for more than 45 million Americans.

On Monday, the Vermont senator unveiled a revamped version of his College for All Act. The legislation also calls for eliminating tuition and fees at two-year and public four-year colleges and universities. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.)—who is still paying off more than $15,000 in student loans after graduating college in 2011—introduced a House companion bill to eliminate all student debt, and Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) introduced a House bill to make public college free.

In recent years, researchers and policymakers have begun to view student borrowing and its side effects as an economic crisis. The Federal Reserve blames student loan debt for young adults’ declining rate of homeownership, and its current chairman, Jerome Powell, has worried publicly that it could stymie long-term economic growth.

Sanders’ debt relief plan goes far beyond anything the democratic socialist touted during his dark horse run for president in 2016. For all the praise and criticism he drew at the time for his “free college” proposal, he had much more modest ideas about how to help those who’d already graduated. He called for cutting interest rates and allowing student loan refinancing—something Hillary Clinton had also suggested.

Sanders and Omar say they’d pay for their debt relief plan with a tax on Wall Street speculation. Sanders’ office points to research from progressive economist Robert Pollin that indicates the tax could raise $2.4 trillion over 10 years. But the lawmakers also argue that their proposed relief package would provide at least $1 trillion in economic stimulus that would justify the expense. Economist Stephanie Kelton, who advised Sanders’ 2016 campaign, worked closely with Sanders and Omar on their new proposal.

Until Sanders’ announcement Monday, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) had been the standard bearer for bold student loan reform in the Democratic primary fight. Warren’s plan proposes a sliding scale that would cancel up to $50,000 for borrowers with household incomes below $250,000, a threshold that would provide relief for 95 percent of borrowers and cancel debt entirely for 75 percent of them. Her targeted system would particularly benefit black and Latinx borrowers, who default at a much higher rate than white borrowers and face discrimination in the job market.

Omar offers a simple explanation for her and Sanders’ blanket approach. “People who take out student loans aren’t wealthy,” her office said in a statement. A “complicated means-tested plan to keep out a doctor or lawyer who might be earning a good living,” it continues, may dissuade students who pursue those expensive degrees from accepting lower-paying careers in public service.

There’s merit to that argument, says Julie Margetta Morgan, who researches student debt at the Roosevelt Institute, a left-leaning think tank. A study she co-authored last year found that debt burdens for costly degrees hadn’t necessarily translated into higher earnings over time, and those who do have higher earnings might be holding off on other trappings of adulthood to cover their loan payments. “Nonpayment isn’t necessarily the best way to measure whether people are struggling with their student loans,” Morgan says.

Morgan adds that Warren and Sanders are tackling the crisis from different perspectives. “The Warren plan looks more closely at targeting the burden of student debt as it relates to racial disparities, and the Sanders plan leans into the strength of universality,” she explains. “There are merits to both.”

But what’s critical is that both Warren and Sanders have paired their student debt visions with a plan to lower the cost of college, says Ben Miller, who works on higher education issues at the Center for American Progress Action Fund. (Warren, like Sanders, proposes free tuition for two- and four-year public colleges.) Still, Miller says, it won’t solve the problem entirely. “Even if you could snap your fingers and cancel student debt, people will still be taking out student loans, particularly for private colleges and graduate school” Miller says. “They really do go hand-in-hand—you can’t do loan cancellation without doing something about affordability going forward.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate