The Democratic Hopefuls Have Endorsed the Green New Deal. So Why The Silence?

Calls for a climate debate are getting louder.

AP Images

For 60 hours this week, dozens of young activists occupied the front steps of the Democratic National Committee headquarters, bearing the extreme heat and humidity of D.C. summers, the mosquitoes, and some rain to camp out in sleeping bags. They were 1,000 miles away from Kamala Harris, standing on the debate stage in Miami, when she took a detour from the usual political cliches to say, on Thursday night, “It’s a climate crisis. It represents an existential threat to us as a species…That is why I support a Green New Deal.”

Eighty people burst into cheers and applause at the first endorsement of the proposed climate resolution in two days of debates among the candidates vying to win the Democratic nomination for next year’s presidential election. Wearing their black-and-yellow Sunrise Movement t-shirts, they watched the results of their year-long efforts to inject climate change into national politics, using a projector aimed at a sheet propped up on a red pickup truck.

Sunrise Movement, a relatively new advocacy group that’s attracted 20-somethings and teenagers to the fight against climate change, ended a two-and-a-half day protest Thursday night when the first presidential debates closed. They didn’t get what they were there demanding—for the DNC to hold its first-ever climate change debate. And they argued that this week’s debates proved their point that climate won’t get enough attention without a dedicated debate. 

Benjamin Finegan, 22, said he thought that during the first night of the debates, the candidates paid mostly “lip service” to the issue. Hannah Perry, 23, said Friday morning, after spending almost 50 hours at the sit-in, “It’s disgraceful to give candidate 15 minutes and think that’s a way to adequately discuss the climate crisis.”

Yet the fact that NBC devoted even 15 minutes to the subject during the first debates is a departure—and a sign of the tectonic shifts in political opinion in less than a year. Climate is now the leading issue named regularly in polling of Democratic primary voters, after years on the bottom. Sunrise activists, however, said they were just getting started.

“I’m tired,” Sunrise’s DC Hub Coordinator Hannah Perry, 23, told me, with a laugh. “Our goal doing this is to make all our institutions feel the climate crisis as deeply and painfully as we do.” Sunrise now plans to stage similar protests across the country, showing up at state and national Democratic offices in advance of a possible DNC resolution coming up for a vote this summer to hold a climate debate. 

Their message seems to be catching on. Fifteen presidential candidates have endorsed the climate debate, and after his own network’s debate ended, MSNBC’s Chris Hayes endorsed it, tweeting: “I think I’ve changed my mind on the need for a climate debate. I see the DNC’s point that it opens up a set of asks for other specifically themed debates. BUT there is just nothing like the climate crisis and no way to wrestle with its scope in the context of a general debate.”

According to a poll released this week by an environmental group, the most popular platform point Democrats have—the call for 100 percent renewable energy within the next 10 to 30 years—never even came up. And aside from Harris’s mention and John Hickenlooper’s criticism of it, the Green New Deal vision for a clean energy economy also barely received mention. That’s strange considering that most of the Democratic candidates, except Hickenlooper, have embraced the central ideas of it, and many of the frontrunners have put forth their own plans. 

The Sunrise Movement members aren’t the only activists calling for the candidates to talk more about climate. “Let’s have a really robust conversation about what we want as a society as we’re getting out of the climate crisis and a sense of stability, said US Climate Action Network Executive Director Keya Chatterjee. “What are the positive visions each has to offer?” Greenpeace’s US Climate Campaigns Director Janet Redman agreed. “Frankly I don’t think we see an indicator that candidates aren’t willing to talk about solutions,” she said. “But I think they need more time to state the case.”

The science shows that the worsening crisis affects everything from national security to the economy, to everyday health, to livelihoods—not to mention the rest of younger generations’ lives. But the niche treatment that climate receives, climate advocates argue, doesn’t begin to get to the scale of the problem. They also point out that debates don’t just get the candidates on record about the issue; they can also educate voters about both problems and solutions—if there’s enough time allowed for a robust discussion.

Indeed, Washington governor and presidential hopeful Jay Inslee made a prediction to me weeks ago when he joined young activists in demanding a climate-focused debate from the DNC. “You have to understand how constricted the opportunity for a full discussion for this will be” during the Democratic debate, he said. “Sixty-second sound bites, which is all you’ll be able to get in a party debate, is grossly inadequate to the task.”

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate