There Is Finally a Confirmed Secretary of Defense. What About All the Other Pentagon Vacancies?

Only 8 senators voted against Mark Esper.

Sha Hanting/China News Service/VCG/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

It only took 204 days, but the Department of Defense finally has a Senate-confirmed leader again. Ninety lawmakers voted Tuesday afternoon to elevate Mark Esper permanently to the position of Secretary of Defense and put an end, at least for now, to the bizarre game of musical chairs Pentagon officials have been forced to play in order to stock an unprecedented amount of vacancies across its top ranks. Only eight senators, including Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who has been sharply critical of Esper’s work as a lobbyist for defense giant Raytheon, opposed his confirmation. 

Esper, a West Point graduate with more than two decades of experience as a soldier, most recently filled in as acting Secretary of Defense after 19 months as the civilian leader of the Army. He will inherit a department that under President Donald Trump has become increasingly sidelined in policy discussions and littered with senior-level vacancies. Possible military confrontations with Iran and Venezuela loom as the administration winds down its war against the Islamic State and negotiates an end to the 18-year war in Afghanistan. 

The staffing turmoil began under Trump’s first Secretary of Defense James Mattis, a retired Marine general, who led the Pentagon with a “skeleton crew,” leaving several crucial roles unfilled for months because the Trump administration preferred hiring loyalists over experienced national security professionals, the New Yorker reported. Mattis departed after a 23-month tenure, and Patrick Shanahan, an ex-Boeing executive with zero experience in foreign affairs or the military, took over in January as acting chief. But an exodus of Mattis-era officials had already begun.

Shanahan’s trajectory to the permanent top job was cut short because of a troubling history of violence inside his family, and, by the time the baton passed to Esper in June, more than a dozen senior positions—including the top three—were staffed by acting, or temporary, officials. With an especially erratic commander in chief leading the way, career Pentagon staff felt isolated during interagency discussions, while Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and national security adviser John Bolton took charge in guiding Trump’s national security policy. “The best advice is not getting through or even offered,” ex-Pentagon official John Gans, the author of a book on the history of the NSC, told Mother Jones last week, reflecting the view of many mid-level Defense staffers. “Nobody has really gotten off the back of their heels.” 

Esper, who rose to the rank of lieutenant colonel, brings a wealth of experience to the Pentagon’s E-Ring, including stints as a congressional aide and chief of staff at the conservative Heritage Foundation. His bipartisan confirmation vote is a rarity for Cabinet officials in the Trump administration and a sign of lawmakers’ deepening concern over the instability plaguing an agency responsible for overseeing more than 3 million service members and one that, at least from a leadership perspective, has avoided this degree of turmoil. 

Even as a Senate-confirmed leader, however, Esper will still have to cope with a Pentagon rife with instability among its highest offices. On Wednesday, acting deputy Defense secretary David Norquist will have his confirmation hearing for the Pentagon’s permanent No. 2 job, but that will require that he revert back to his comptroller position temporarily to make way for another acting figure. The Army and Air Force, meanwhile, still lack permanent leaders. Of the department’s numerous vacancies, Trump has only named potential replacements for three top positions, chief management officer, Army secretary, and Air Force secretary. He has formally nominated one of them, Lisa Hershman for the CMO position.

Other senior positions remain vacant, staffed by acting or temporary officials, depending on if the White House will nominate replacements and if the Senate will confirm them. Here are the positions waiting to be filled, according to the latest data provided by the Pentagon: 

Chief Management Officer
Secretary (and Under Secretary) of the Air Force
Secretary (and Under Secretary) of the Army
Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Energy, Installations, and Environment
General Counsel of the Navy
Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness
Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs
Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict
Pentagon inspector general

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate