Video Games Have Nothing to Do With Mass Shootings. But Gamers Kinda Do.

Toxic elements in the gaming community helped make 8chan what it is, giving a home to white nationalist killers.

Mother Jones illustration; Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In the wake of consecutive mass shootings in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, Republican politicians went rummaging through the dated bargain bin of excuses for gun violence and latched on to a familiar find: video games.

“We must stop the glorification of violence in our society. This includes the gruesome and grisly video games that are now commonplace,” Trump said on Monday morning in remarks about the shootings. His comments came just one day after House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) voiced similar concerns, saying “the idea of these video games that dehumanize individuals to have a game of shooting individuals and others—I’ve always felt that is a problem.”

The idea that video games might be a substantial driver of violence, like most things in bargain bins, is both old and not good. It’s been pushed at least since the Columbine High School shootings in 1999, alongside anxieties that metal singer Marilyn Manson somehow motivated that attack. It’s also been debunked since Columbine. Studies routinely disprove or fail to find a link between violence and video games. Other countries with large video game markets like Japan and China don’t have mass shooting or gun violence rates anywhere close to those in the United States.

While McCarthy and Trump are wrong about the link between video games and guns, recent years have shown there is a link between some parts of video game culture and extremist violence. The 8chan imageboard, where multiple recent attackers—allegedly including the assailant in El Pas0—have spread word of their actions, was born out of Gamergate, an extensive online culture war that started in 2o14, featuring vicious harassment campaigns targeting women in the gaming industry. Some gamers were frustrated with what they saw as unnecessary political correctness and progressivism creeping into games in the wake of calls for more diversity in the gaming industry and in games themselves. Just as mainstream conservatives, who also skew white and male, have voiced their frustration with calls for diversity and protections for marginalized groups, counterparts in the gaming community have lashed out at similar initiatives in that space.

While 8chan had been founded in 2013, it didn’t come to prominence until the rhetoric around Gamergate became more explicitly hateful and misogynistic, and 4chan, an older message board that had helped play host to the movement, decided to ban the topic. Gamergaters flocked to 8chan, whose founders were touting it as a free-speech alternative to 4chan, helping create a hotbed of deeply dangerous and hateful rhetoric about women and people of color. It would eventually help incubate several prominent instances of white supremacist violence. 

Memes referencing videos games are part of many posts on the platform, and have even been used by recent shooters in manifestos they published on 8chan. New Zealand’s Christchurch mosque shooter livestreamed his massacre in the style of a first-person shooter video game, and the Poway synagogue shooter described killing as striving for a “high score.” 

Gaming culture as a whole does not, of course, advocate mass shootings, nor is it necessarily extremist. Marginalized groups and individuals have found welcoming, helpful, and supportive pockets across video gaming, and there is a wealth of healthy and inclusive communities that don’t support white nationalism or reactionary politics. Women in the video game industry have made strides in pushing for better representation and inclusivity

Video games don’t inherently lend themselves to reactionary politics, but there is a significant segment of reactionary individuals who play games and are connected to that world,” says Whitney Phillips, who researches online extremism at Syracuse University. She says the members of that segment came together on Gamergate and 8chan, where they amplified the racism, misogyny, and hate widespread in American culture.

While the reactionaries who make up the darkest parts of gaming culture deserve culpability for broadcasting and promoting bigotry, Phillips pointed out that targeting gaming culture as the source of white supremacist shootings is about as misguided as blaming the video games themselves.

“You have an enormous subset of white youth who are raised in white supremacist structures. You have a large group of young people who have been primed to have some sympathy for the idea of white replacement,” she said, referring to a hoax peddled by white supremacists that there is a plot to replace white people with people of color. “Structural white supremacy is a part of the oxygen of American society. It just is.”

The internet has more broadly played host to similar ideas. Radical and extremist content have risen on Facebook, YouTube, Reddit, and Twitter, giving a megaphone to some of the most toxic parts of American culture. “The internet doesn’t amplify anything, it amplifies the worst things,” she said. “It’s important to get these things right, but it’s hard. The problems of hate and white supremacy are enormous. You’re basically dealing with the history of the entire United States.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate