DC Mayor Rejects Plan for Migrant Children Facility in the Capital

“We have no intention of accepting a new federal facility, least of all one that detains and dehumanizes migrant children.”

Washington, DC, Mayor Muriel Bowser in 2014Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP Photo

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In search of additional space to house migrant children, the Trump administration awarded a contract this month to a company that wants to open a facility in the administration’s own backyard of Washington, DC. On Tuesday, Mayor Muriel Bowser announced that she would not allow the center to open in the staunchly Democratic city.

“We have no intention of accepting a new federal facility,” Bowser said in a statement Tuesday in response to an inquiry from Mother Jones, “least of all one that detains and dehumanizes migrant children.”

The detention center would house up to 200 unaccompanied migrant children from ages 12 to 17 in the Takoma neighborhood in Northwest Washington. It would be run by Dynamic Service Solutions, a company based in nearby National Harbor, Maryland, that has no record of experience running facilities for children. 

The Department of Health and Human Services, which is responsible for caring for children who arrive at the border without a parent or legal guardian, awarded Dynamic Service Solutions a $20,549,911 grant this month to operate the shelter, according to a statement sent to Mother Jones by the press office of HHS’s Administration for Children and Families (ACF). Washington, DC, has several options to prevent the center from opening, including passing legislation to ban the facility and using regulatory restrictions. The shelter program is being called ChildrenFirst DC, according to the ACF press office.

Brandon Todd, the DC Council member who represents the area where Dynamic Service Solutions wants to operate the shelter, said he was “shocked and appalled” by the shelter proposal. HHS has been criticized for inadequate medical care at its contractors’ shelters, as well as for failing to provide required legal services for children in its custody.

ACF’s press office pushed back against criticism of its shelters, which are sometimes conflated with the Customs and Border Protection temporary holding facilities at the border where people have been held in cages. It stressed that children in HHS custody receive educational services and have access to recreational activities including sports and board games. “Unfortunately, uninformed individuals continue to perpetuate erroneous and irresponsible stories which only hinder our ability to run this program successfully and unify children with their parents, family member or other suitable sponsor,” the press office said.

In 2017, Dynamic Service Solutions was awarded an $8.7 million contract by the US Department of Health and Human Services to shelter and care for unaccompanied minors in the United States. The new $20.5 million contract awarded in August has not previously been reported.

The company recently posted job openings in Washington for bilingual youth care workers and teachers. One posting, for a “lead teacher” position, stipulates that the teacher will have to meet the Office of Refugee Resettlement guidelines, which dictate that unaccompanied minors must receive “a minimum of six hours of structured education.”

But the DC government, which has consistently opposed Trump administration policies, would have none of it. “Washington D.C. will not be complicit in the inhumane practice of detaining migrant children in Warehouses,” Bowser stated.

ACF said there are currently about 8,100 unaccompanied children in its custody, down from a record high of about 14,000 in November. Children in HHS care are generally released to live with sponsors who are usually parents or close relatives. ACF said children are spending 45 days on average in HHS custody, down from a peak of 93 days in November. The average stay was 34 days in January 2016.

Dynamic Service Solutions referred Mother Jones to HHS’s Office of Refugee Resettlement, the part of ACF responsible for unaccompanied children. The company has nine employees listed on LinkedIn. According to its website, the company has worked with the US Army Corps of Engineers to train US soldiers and Iraqis on electrical safety and provided engineers and technicians to other federal agencies, including the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Department of Health and Human Services.

This story has been updated with new information from the Administration for Children and Families.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate