House Judiciary Committee Subpoenas Corey Lewandowski and Rick Dearborn

The subpoena comes as Trump’s ex-campaign manager mulls a Senate bid.

Mandel Ngan/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Corey Lewandowski, Donald Trump’s former campaign manager who on Thursday got an apparent endorsement from Trump for a possible Senate bid in New Hampshire, recently received something else: a subpoena from the House Judiciary Committee. 

House Judiciary Chair Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) announced Thursday that the panel subpoenaed Lewandowski and Rick Dearborn, a former campaign aide and White House deputy chief of staff for policy, for public testimony on September 17. The committee is investigating whether Trump obstructed justice by trying to shut down former special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the campaign’s contacts with Russia.

Lewandowski and Dearborn were involved in efforts by Trump in 2017 to pressure then–Attorney General Jeff Sessions to reverse his recusal from the Justice Department’s Russia investigation and attempt to limit Mueller’s probe. According to Mueller’s report, Trump on June 19, 2017, asked Lewandowski to tell Sessions to announce that he was limiting Mueller’s probe to “investigating election meddling for future elections.” That would have meant an end to any investigation of the conduct of Trump and his aides. Lewandowski apparently did not deliver that message. In a private meeting a month later, Trump again pressed his former aide, who at the time was working to set up a lobbying practice, to push Sessions to restrict Mueller’s probe. If Sessions declined a meeting request, Trump said, Lewandowski should tell Sessions he was fired, according to Mueller’s report.

Instead of delivering Trump’s message to Sessions, Lewandowski asked Dearborn, a former top aide to Sessions in the Senate, to do so. Lewandowski gave Dearborn “a typewritten version of the message the President had dictated to be delivered to Sessions,” according to Mueller. Dearborn told Mueller’s office that he never delivered the message to Sessions.

This is one of 10 instances of possible obstruction by Trump detailed in Mueller’s report. Like former White House Counsel Don McGahn, another key obstruction witness, Lewandowski and Dearborn are likely to resist the subpoenas, citing sweeping claims of privilege the White House is asserting. But Lewandowski, since he never worked in the White House, has a weaker case.

“It is clear that any other American would have been prosecuted based on the evidence Special Counsel Mueller uncovered in his report,” Nadler said in a statement. 

Nadler said the Judiciary Committee plans “to hold hearings and obtain testimony over the coming months as part of its efforts to hold the President accountable as we move forward with our investigation into obstruction, corruption and abuse of power by Trump and his associates. This will help the Committee determine whether to recommend articles of impeachment against the President or other Article 1 remedies. No one is above the law.”

Lewandowski was ousted from Trump’s presidential campaign after clashes with other Trump advisers and an incident in which he was charged with misdemeanor battery for forcibly grabbing a reporter. That charge was later dropped. But the ex-aide has reportedly retained regular access to Trump.

Lewandowski has previously clashed with Democrats investigating the Trump-Russia scandal. He reportedly shouted and cursed at Democrats during a March 2018 interview by the House Intelligence Committee. “I’m not answering your fucking question,” Lewandowski shouted at one point, CNN reported.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate