Joe Biden Is Working His Way Toward an Answer on Obama’s Deportations

“The focus was on deporting felons.”

Cory Booker and Joe Biden during the second of two Democratic debates in Detroit.John Nowak/CNN via ZUMA Wire

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

During Wednesday night’s debate, Joe Biden completely dodged questions about his views on the record number of immigrant deportations carried out while he was Barack Obama’s vice president. But on Saturday, he took a shot at addressing the matter.

Speaking at candidate forum hosted by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees in Las Vegas, Biden still would not say if he opposed or supported the Obama administration’s policy. But he did at least go beyond what he said Wednesday. In his comments Saturday, he seemed to imply that the deportations under Obama were an agency-generated policy that resulted from the White House’s focus on other issues. The former VP also argued that Obama generally imposed progressive immigration policies that were later scrapped by President Donald Trump. In addition, he said that when it came to deportations, Obama’s focus was on removing felons from the country.

This is a difficult issue for Biden. He wants to associate himself with Obama, who is beloved by Democratic primary voters, while avoiding an issue that continues to enrage many Democratic activists. As Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) told him Wednesday, “Mr. Vice President, you can’t have it both ways.”

During the CNN-hosted debate, Biden said zilch when Booker and New York Mayor Bill de Blasio pressed him on deportations. “Did you say those deportations were a good idea?” asked de Blasio. “Or did you go to the president and say, ‘This is a mistake; we shouldn’t do it.’?” Biden responded by saying he was “vice president, not president,” and asserting that he keeps his recommendations to Obama private.

On Saturday, Biden tried to offer context: He explained that he and Obama were doing a lot of things. “We learned a lot in the process,” Biden said. “Look, when the president got elected, everything landed on this desk but locusts. We were about to go into a depression…We’ve forgotten just how bad things were. It took an enormous, enormous amount of time and energy just to get the recovery act passed, which the president asked me to manage.”

Biden also suggested the deportations were a policy the Obama White House allowed while expecting to eventually overhaul immigration laws. And he cited Obama’s program to give various groups of undocumented immigrants a period of “deferred action from immigration” or DACA. He also touted the White House’s support for an immigration reform bill that passed the Senate but never received a House vote.

“I think what happened was the president thought, we thought, at the beginning that we’d get…a more rational approach, for example, to way we deal for example with immigration,” Biden said. “By the middle of the term it was clear that wasn’t doing to happen and things changed. So what did he do? He came along with the Dreamers program. He introduced a piece of legislation to provide access for the 11 million undocumenteds.”

Pressed on what he discussed with Obama about the policy, Biden ultimately offered what he called a paraphrase: “The focus was on deporting felons,” he said. “It was not locking up people and separating them from their children…Comparing what we did with what Trump did, I think is just absolutely off the wall. It’s just not true.”

Biden was crisper when asked if he supports decriminalizing entering the country illegally, a stance held by former HUD Secretary Julián Castro and others. “I do not,” Biden said. “It will be an invitation to come.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate