Pelosi: “The Focus Now Has to Be on Mitch McConnell”

The speaker is turning up the pressure on universal background checks.

House Speaker Nancy PelosiSusan Walsh/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) had a simple message for gun control advocates when she addressed them Monday evening. “The focus now has to be on Mitch McConnell,” she said. “Bring the Senate back.”

After a weekend of deadly mass shootings, Pelosi was referring to renewed efforts to pass legislation that would require a background check for every gun sale. The Democratic-controlled House passed a background check bill—along with two other bills that would close loopholes in existing laws surrounding gun sales—earlier this year. But McConnell, the Kentucky Republican at the helm of the Senate, has refused to bring any of those measures up for a vote. Both houses of Congress are currently on recess until the middle of September, prompting calls for lawmakers to return to Washington, DC, to work on the issue. And so Pelosi is hoping to focus national attention on which party has already worked to reform the nation’s gun laws, and which hasn’t.

Pelosi’s comments came during a conference call that the House Speaker held with representatives from gun violence prevention groups such as March for Our Lives, Giffords, and Brady United, as well as with Latino civic engagement groups such as Mi Familia Vota and the Latino Victory Project. The conversation had originally been organized following an earlier mass shooting at a festival in Gilroy, Calif., that left three dead. Details of the conference call were provided to Mother Jones by a participant.

Pelosi called on the activists to use public outrage over Republican inaction to pressure McConnell to hold a vote on the House legislation. “It’s not done until they pass the [universal background checks] bill,” Pelosi said. “We can’t have any confusion in the public’s mind.”

It was a reiteration of what Pelosi had outlined in a letter to her House colleagues about her chamber’s next steps. She said that, starting next week, the House Homeland Security Committee would hold hearings on white supremacy and domestic terrorism. Over the next several weeks, House Democrats would use pro forma sessions, tele-town halls, and district events to help put pressure on the Senate. The message they are hoping to send to the upper chamber’s Republican’s is simple: Return from August recess to pass gun reform laws. If the Senate acts, Pelosi noted, the House will reconvene, as well. “The House stands ready to return to pass legislation, if the Senate sends us back an amended bipartisan bill or if other legislation is ready for House action,” she wrote.

But not all House Democrats agree that Pelosi’s strategy is the right one. On a conference call with members earlier that day, a number of Democratic lawmakers pressed the speaker to cancel August recess and bring her caucus back to vote on a number of other gun reform proposals, including bills that would ban high-capacity magazines and assault weapons, as well as “red flag” legislation that would enable law enforcement to take guns away from those who pose a risk to themselves or others. All three of these measures could theoretically have helped prevent this weekend’s mass shootings, which involved military-style weapons and large magazines that allowed the shooters to kill and wound so many people in brief periods of time.

Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), the co-chairs of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, issued a statement calling for Congress to “immediately consider” Rep. David Cicilline’s (D-R.I.) assault weapons ban legislation, which has 191 Democratic cosponsors. Cicilline himself called for House members to return to Washington to consider the bill.

But Robin Lloyd, the managing director of Giffords, warned against the temptation to focus political attention on specialized bills related to high-profile massacres at the expense of broader measures—such as background checks—that many experts say would curb the more commonplace shootings that are responsible for the vast majority of gun deaths.

“We have everyday gun violence in this country,” Lloyd said. “We need to take action on really strong policies the House already passed that address that reality.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate