August 9, 2019

Trump’s Response to Two Gun Massacres Was a Full Week of Disasters

A photo of the president flashing a thumbs-up as he posed with an orphaned baby is being widely condemned.

As President Donald Trump departed the White House on Friday for a Hamptons fundraiser, a photo taken during Trump’s visit to meet with victims of the El Paso, Texas, shooting was going viral.

“This photo is so hard to look at,” Jon Lovett of Pod Save America tweeted. “The thumbs up. The wrongness of all of it.”

“This is obscene,” another journalist wrote. 

The image, which was first posted on the First Lady’s account, showed the president smiling and flashing a thumbs-up, as he posed with a baby who was orphaned in the El Paso, Texas shooting. The photo quickly sparked condemnation and palpable disgust on social media. It came as the latest in a series of serious missteps to come out of Trump’s visit to El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, where 31 people were killed last weekend in mass shootings.

Earlier, a cellphone recording emerged showing Trump bragging about the crowd size of a rally he held in El Paso months earlier while touring the hospital. “I was here three months ago…That place was packed,” Trump said. “That was some crowd—and we had twice the number outside. And then you had this crazy Beto. Beto had like 400 people in a parking lot.”

The hospital visit was just one of many forums where Trump, in the face of two national tragedies, appeared squarely focused on himself this week.

Just hours before arriving in Dayton on Wednesday to commemorate the shooting there, Trump tweeted an attack at a prominent political opponent from El Paso: “Beto (phony name to indicate Hispanic heritage) O’Rourke, who is embarrassed by my last visit to the Great State of Texas, where I trounced him, and is now even more embarrassed by polling at 1% in the Democrat Primary, should respect the victims & law enforcement—& be quiet!”

Later, Trump lashed out at Dayton Mayor Nan Whaley and Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), angrily claiming they had “totally misrepresented” his visit.

“I’m really confused, we said he was treated very well,” Whaley said in response to Trump’s tweet. “I don’t know what they’re talking about ‘misrepresenting.'”

“Oh well. He lives in his world of Twitter.”

Trump concluded the week much as he started: vaguely signaling his support for strengthening background checks. “I will tell you I spoke to Mitch McConnell yesterday,” Trump told reporters. “He’s totally on board. He said, ‘I’ve been waiting for your call.'”

A spokesman for McConnell clarified that the Kentucky lawmaker had yet to endorse any specific gun reforms. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate