Trump’s UN Speech on Religious Freedom Conveniently Ignored One Major Point

An American ally is persecuting religious minorities at record levels.

Drew Angerer/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Nearly four years after proposing a ban on Muslim immigrants as part of his presidential campaign, Donald Trump devoted his first major appearance at this year’s United Nations General Assembly to religious liberty, a topic that has increasingly emerged as a central administration talking point.

“Approximately 80 percent of the world’s population live in countries where religious liberty is threatened, restricted, or even banned,” Trump said at the event, citing a statistic from a Pew Research Center report that also attributed anti-Muslim sentiment, in part, to him. “When I heard that number, I said, ‘Please go back and check it because it can’t possibly be correct.’ And, sadly, it was. Eighty percent.” (It’s actually 83 percent.) 

Trump and his advisers, including Vice President Mike Pence and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, love this statistic. They’ve invoked it several times during the administration’s months-long push to make religious freedom a central plank of American foreign policy, which has included two State Department summits and Trump’s Oval Office meeting in July with victims of religious persecution.

And while they’re quick to highlight American adversaries like Nicaragua and Venezuela, as Trump did in his Monday speech, they often fail to mention an ally which Pew rates as one of the worst suppressors of religious freedom: Saudi Arabia. 

Under the growing influence of Crown Prince Mohamed bin Salman, who Trump praised in June for sparking a “revolution in a very positive way,” Saudi Arabia has already executed 134 people this year, on pace for an increase over last year’s total of 149 prisoners killed, according to a report submitted to the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva last week. Six were children at the time of their alleged crimes. Among the slain were 37 men, mostly from the country’s Shia Muslim minority, who were killed en masse in April. Saudi authorities accused them of links to terrorist organizations, but those arrested “didn’t appear to be connected to Islamic State or another extremist group,” the Wall Street Journal reported

Saudi Arabia performs most executions by beheading and, in many cases, the country “failed or refused to release the bodies of victims of executions to their families,” the report stated. Charges “appear to broadly relate to political dissidence and participation in protests,” and are often extracted by forced confessions. One detainee awaiting execution by crucifixion, which means his body will be displayed after the beheading, was 15 at the time of his arrest and confessed to a range of nonviolent offenses, such as “chanting slogans,” after what the report describes as “beatings with iron rods.” 

The report, compiled by British human rights lawyer Helena Kennedy, brought more international condemnation on Saudi Arabia and the crown prince, whose early reputation as a moderate reformer has fallen apart amid his costly intervention in Yemen’s civil war and crackdown on dissent among Saudi elites, which culminated in the murder last year of Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi journalist writing for the Washington Post. The CIA determined in November that the Saudi crown prince ordered the killing.

Even the State Department has acknowledged the kingdom’s sordid history of persecuting religious minorities. “Freedom of religion is not provided under the law,” a department report on religious freedom flatly stated earlier this year. “The government does not allow the public practice of any non-Muslim religion.” The US Commission on International Religious Freedom, a bipartisan advisory body, drew attention to the State Department’s uneven response to Saudi Arabia in a blistering statement after the kingdom’s mass executions of mostly Shia men in April. “The State Department must stop giving a free pass to the Saudi government, which, for many years, has punished numerous Saudi citizens and expatriate workers for exercising their fundamental right to freedom of religion or belief,” commission chair Tenzin Dorjee said, noting that the US has repeatedly identified Saudi Arabia as a “country of particular concern” for its religious persecution, but has held off on issuing any punitive action for more than a decade.

Far from scolding Saudi Arabia, Trump has praised its crown prince for doing “a really spectacular job” fighting terrorists and granting women the right to drive. (Left unsaid was Saudi Arabia’s year-long imprisonment of the same activists who pushed for that modernizing change.) 

Trump himself is no “tireless champion of the freedom of religion,” as Pence claimed in his introductory remarks at the UN. In addition to promoting a Muslim ban, which his administration softened into a travel ban affecting several majority-Muslim countries, Trump has frequently trafficked in anti-Semitic tropes and once said there was “a Muslim problem in the world.” His religious freedom push writ large has often received criticism for seeming to be geared more toward Christians at the expense of other minority groups. 

Saudi Arabia has been an American ally for decades, but Trump has taken a relationship with its roots in the oil and arms trade and foregrounded the unsavory quid pro quo inherent to a partnership between an authoritarian theocracy and Western democracy. “After my heavily negotiated trip to Saudi Arabia last year, the Kingdom agreed to spend and invest $450 billion in the United States,” Trump noted in a 638-word statement defending the Saudis in November, as pressure tightened on the White House to hold the kingdom accountable for Khashoggi’s murder. “This is a record amount of money. It will create hundreds of thousands of jobs, tremendous economic development, and much additional wealth for the United States.”

The high regard with which Trump holds the Saudis was most apparent on Friday, when he approved the deployment of US troops to the Middle East in response to an apparent Iranian attack on two Saudi oil facilities. (No evidence has emerged to definitively link Iran to the attack, and the Islamic republic has denied responsibility, but Trump administration officials like Pompeo have blamed them for it.) Trump, who has otherwise criticized American allies for expecting the US to foot the bill for their defense, tweeted in support of the Saudis in a way that suggested he was relying on their direction before responding. 

“Too often, people in positions of power preach diversity while silencing, shunning, or censoring the faithful,” Trump said during his UN speech. “True tolerance means respecting the right of all people to express their deeply held religious beliefs.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate