With a Click of the Like Button, a Trump HUD Official Violated Federal Law

No, not Ben Carson.

Cheriss May/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Update, September 19, 2019: Lynne Patton released a statement on the US Office of Special Counsel’s ruling saying, “I am grateful that the Office of Special Counsel remains an unbiased voice in Washington, DC that examines complaints based upon their merits instead of their number of retweets. To that end, OSC has determined that I did not violate the Hatch Act as it pertained to my attendance at the Michael Cohen hearing, as well as my tweet defending Secretary Carson. To the contrary, OSC decided not to pursue disciplinary at all for two minor infractions. I look forward to continuing to focus on the residents of New York and New Jersey, whose well-being I care about the most.”

Lynne Patton, the New York and New Jersey regional administrator at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, is well-known for her active and often controversial social media presence, in which she often attacks liberals and expresses admiration for President Donald Trump. But her laissez-faire attitude about how government officials should conduct themselves online may be starting to catch up with her.

On Tuesday, the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a nonprofit watchdog group, announced that their complaints against Patton for possible violations of the Hatch Act have resulted in a reprimand from the US Office of Special Counsel. In their complaints, CREW accused Patton of using her Twitter account in ways that breached the Hatch Act’s prohibition of federal executive branch employees using their official authority to engage in certain political or partisan activities. A letter from the OSC confirmed that Patton had violated the law. “After years of serving Donald Trump’s interests, it appears that Lynne Patton is still doing so in her taxpayer-funded job,” CREW’s Executive Director Noah Bookbinder said in a press release.

CREW’s initial complaint alleged that Patton used her official Twitter account, @LynnePattonHUD (not to be confused with @LynnePatton, her personal account) to engage in political activity by “liking” a number of different partisan tweets. In December 2017, Donald Trump’s tweet endorsing Ron DeSantis for Governor of Florida received a “like” from @LynnePattonHUD. The following February she “liked” a tweet from Republican National Committee chairperson Ronna McDaniel opposing Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W. Va.).

In April 2018, she “liked” a tweet from the official Republican National Committee Twitter account supporting Mike Pompeo as Secretary of State, and a week later she “liked” a tweet from Kanye West. The tweet in question read “my MAGA hat is signed” and included a picture of a signed campaign hat. West’s tweet has since been deleted. In total, CREW noted that Patton had done this four times. 

CREW also alleged that Patton violated the law by having a Trump campaign hat displayed in her office. In March, she was profiled by New York Magazine and in one of the photos, a red “USA” hat from the Trump campaign is visible behind the desk in her HUD office. The OSC letter said that Patton didn’t realize this and once the allegations against her were made public, she immediately removed it. Ultimately, the OSC decided not to take disciplinary action against Patton and instead reprimanded her, advising her that any more violations would result in “further action.”

These instances are not the only time Patton has been accused of violating the Hatch Act. Earlier this year, Patton shared a post from a Twitter account supporting HUD Secretary Ben Carson and mocking Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.).

She retweeted it from both her personal and private accounts, saying she didn’t care if it was a violation of the Hatch Act. When called out by Twitter users of the possible transgression, Patton responded bluntly: “What part of I don’t give a shit don’t you understand?”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate