The Democratic Primary No Longer Revolves Around Joe Biden

Tuesday’s debate was all about Elizabeth Warren.

Joe Biden

Christy Prosser/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Since late April, when the former vice president kicked off his campaign with a rally in Pittsburgh, the Democratic presidential primary has revolved around Joe Biden. He led every national poll for months and was the centerpiece of every debate stage he appeared on. A procession of younger challengers took turns trying to draw blood—Eric Swalwell, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, Julian Castro. Over the last month, Biden’s centrality to the race has taken on a new dimension, as the House of Representatives investigates whether President Donald Trump committed an impeachable offense in asking the government of Ukraine to investigate Biden and his son, Hunter.

But for most of Tuesday’s debate in Ohio, Biden was largely an afterthought. Instead, Elizabeth Warren—who has recently overtaken Biden in a number of polls—dictated the terms of the debate. Over the first half of the debate she talked twice as much as Biden, and, somewhat relatedly, was also talked about by everyone else. South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg went after her on Medicare for All. Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar tried to pick a fight with Warren over the Massachusetts senator’s proposal for a wealth tax. Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard twice tried to use her time to get into a one-on-one debate with Warren on foreign policy. California Sen. Kamala Harris tried—for a surprisingly long time—to get Warren to sign onto her letter asking Twitter to delete Trump’s account. (No dice.)

Warren’s public statements and policy proposals were also the impetus for questions that the moderators directed to other candidates—Andrew Yang, for instance, was asked about her position on breaking up tech companies. In a campaign, you make a name for yourself by going after the biggest figure on stage. And for one night at least, there was no bigger figure than Warren.

It was only in the debate’s waning minutes that Biden began to assert himself more forcefully. Asked about the appeal of the populist message of Warren and and Bernie Sanders, Biden insisted that some of his opponents were being too vague—“you’ve got to level with people!”

“I’m the only one on this stage who’s gotten anything really big done,” Biden continued, rattling off a list of legislative accomplishments. “The question is who’s gonna be able to get it done?”

“Who do you think is being vague?” CNN moderator Anderson Cooper asked.

Biden held out his hand toward Warren, and then thought better about it, and added in Sanders, too. “Both of them are being vague on the question of Medicare for All.”

A short while later, when Warren touted her work in creating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Biden was indignant. “I went on the floor and got you votes,” he said, referring to the law creating the bureau. What did the Warren have to say to that?

“I am deeply grateful to President Obama, who fought so hard to make sure that agency was passed into law” she began, very pointedly. Biden broke into a huge grin at the omission. He’d been erased from his own administration.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate