Democratic Campaign Group Won’t Support Anti-Abortion Candidates

The move by the Democratic Attorneys General Association bucks other party organizations.

Kentucky Attorney General Andy Beshear, who won the governor's race on a pro-choice platform in a deep-red state, acknowledges supporters at his election night party in Louisville on November 5.Bryan Woolston/AP Photo

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Saturday, Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards’ reelection victory in deep-red Louisiana sent a strong signal that there’s a future for anti-abortion candidates in the Democratic Party.

Two days later, a prominent group of national Democrats sent the opposite message.

On Monday, the Democratic Attorneys General Association, which works to elect Democratic state attorneys general, vowed not to support anti-abortion candidates. That means it will endorse Democratic candidates in general elections and give them financial support only if they back the right to an abortion, even in states whose voters are overwhelmingly opposed to abortion. The group does not endorse or give money in Democratic primaries.*

The association’s decision came just weeks after Kentucky Attorney General Andy Beshear, an outspoken pro-choice Democrat, defeated Gov. Matt Bevin in an upset. Beshear’s victory signaled that Democrats don’t need to be anti-abortion to win in the South. His win also highlighted the importance of the attorney general position as a stepping stone for higher office.

Then came the win for Edwards, who signed one of the most restrictive abortion bans in the country earlier this year. Edwards was supported by the Democratic Governors Association, which currently does not have a policy against supporting anti-abortion candidates. Other major Democratic election organizations, including the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and the National Conference of Democratic Mayors, have supported anti-abortion Democrats in the past.  

Although Edwards is an outlier in the national Democratic Party, he wasn’t the only anti-abortion Democrat to run for governor this cycle. Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood, who lost against Republican Tate Reeves earlier this month in the state’s governor’s race, identifies as a “pro-life” Democrat. Hood also supported Mississippi’s “fetal heartbeat” bill, which bans abortion at around six weeks, telling Mississippi Today that he will continue to defend “every single law passed protecting the unborn.” Hood gave up the attorney general position to run for governor, but in the future, anti-abortion attorney general candidates like him will have to run without the political and financial support of the Democratic Attorneys General Association.

“We had two Democratic attorneys general running for office, Andy Beshear in Kentucky and Jim Hood in Mississippi,” says Sean Rankin, executive director of the Democratic Attorneys General Association. “One was pro-choice, and one was pro-life. The narrative in the past has been to win in the South you have to be pro-life, but Jim Hood didn’t win, and Andy Beshear did, so I think that myth is changing.”

Hood’s decision to support Mississippi’s abortion ban in court highlights one of the ways attorneys general can affect access to abortion. Unlike Hood, other Democratic attorneys general across the country have declined to support similar abortion restrictions in court. Last year, Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller refused to defend his state’s six-week abortion ban, saying that it violated his beliefs and that the ban, “if upheld, would undermine rights and protections for women.” 

Declining to defend anti-abortion laws in court is just one of the tools attorneys general have to affect reproductive rights policies. Earlier this month, a coalition of Democratic attorneys general successfully blocked the Trump administration’s “conscience rule,” which would have allowed providers to deny patients access to a range of health care services, including abortions and contraception, on the basis of their moral and religious beliefs. Democratic attorneys general have also sued the Trump administration over other anti-abortion policies, such as the “gag rule,” which blocks federal funding to organizations that perform or refer patients for abortion services.

“As the battle for reproductive rights unfolds at the ballot box, in statehouses, and courtrooms across this country, there is no group of elected officials better positioned to lead the fight for our rights than state Attorneys General,” Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum, a co-chair of the Democratic Attorneys General Association, said in a statement.

Correction: An earlier version of this article misstated the stage of an election in which the Democratic Attorneys General Association gets involved. It endorses and provides financial support in general elections, not primaries.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate