Turns Out, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Is Huge in Iowa

And she might just be Bernie Sanders’ most important surrogate.

Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez stand on stage Friday on the campus of Iowa Western Community College in Council Bluffs.AP Photo/Nati Harnik

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was welcomed to Iowa with a roast. On Friday, while the first-term Democratic congresswoman from New York was introducing Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders at a rally in Council Bluffs, the stateā€™s Republican bigwigs took their shots at the Lincolnā€“Reagan Dinner at a Marriott ballroom in downtown Des Moines.

ā€œDoctor Ocasio-Cortez,ā€ state GOP chairman Jeff Kaufmann announced, would be in town the next day with ā€œCrazy Bernie.ā€ ā€œSheā€™s got a problem with our cows here!ā€ he said, referring to the Green New Deal she and Sanders had come to Iowa to talk about.

Joni Ernst, the stateā€™s Republican junior senator, brought up the pair again, and again the audience booed. ā€œWe know what kind of reception theyā€™re gonna get!ā€

Did we? At three stops over two days, Ocasio-Cortez was greeted with only a smattering of protestsā€”I saw four people with weird signs on Saturday making fun of her for being a bartenderā€”and large crowds in Council Bluffs, Des Moines, and Coralville. These were her first appearances with Sanders since she endorsed him in Queens last month. Technically, she was here in the first-in-the-nation caucus state to talk up the Green New Deal, the sweeping economic and environmental overhaul she introduced in Congress to combat climate change, now a major plank in the Sanders platform. But more than that, she was here as a sort of proof of conceptā€”living, breathing evidence that the political revolution Sanders had promised wasnā€™t just happening but evolving.

The centerpiece of Ocasio-Cortezā€™s visit was a three-hour long climate summit at Drake University on Saturday. People heard from speakers such as Zina Precht-Rodriguez, an organizer at the Sunrise Movement, and the writer and activist Naomi Klein. Panelists discussed chicken farming and water quality and renewable energy while sitting in front of big watercolor panels painted by the artist Molly Crabappleā€”workers in orange vests putting up solar panels, workers in orange vests working on wind turbines, workers in orange vestsā€¦farming, maybe? I could go on about the content of the thing, but the content wasnā€™t what was revelatory; what was remarkable was the fact that it was happening at all.

ā€œFour years ago when I was running around Iowa and New Hampshire and going all over this country, I talked about climate change, and people nodded their heads and I said, yeah, itā€™s a serious problem,ā€ Sanders told the crowd in Des Moines. ā€œI was on a national debate [and] a moderator said, ā€˜What do you think is the great national security crisis facing this country?ā€™ And I said climate change. People kind of didnā€™t fully appreciate that answer. But the point is that over the last four years, as I go around the country today, people do understand.ā€

This is a meaningful shift in the United States, driven in large part by a revitalized activist movement. But itā€™s also a shift in how Sanders approached the issue. Four years ago, Sanders wasnā€™t avoiding the issue of climate change. (He was talking up ā€œfossil fuel billionaires,ā€ and pushing a climate agenda of his own.) But he wasn’t running on it quite like this, with three-hour summits where people who arenā€™t running for any office at all talked about the poultry industry, and corporate consolidation of pig-farming, and electrification of freight rail. He wasnā€™t doing a full weekend of events on the theme, in a state where corn and beef are king. No, this was something new, because in the time since the last campaign ended and this one began, the kinds of idealistic young lefty activists his campaign had counted on in 2016 had latched onto something else entirely and built it into a new organizing force.

And it was being shepherded, to a large degree, by the woman on stage with himā€”a former campaign organizer whoā€™d protested at Standing Rock, then went and ran for Congress, and then almost immediately introduced the Green New Deal. She is Sandersā€™ most powerful surrogate in 2020 precisely because her career is the story the movement wants to believe about itself.

Ocasio-Cortez also just happens to be uncommonly good at this, adept at inverting the arguments that have traditionally been wielded against people with politics like hers. ā€œWhen it comes to a Green New Deal people sayā€”always, always, always with this question of ā€˜how are you going to pay for it?ā€™ā€ she said. ā€œAs if weā€™re not paying for it now.ā€ She rattled off a list of recent, headline-grabbing shocksā€”the California wildfires, Hurricane Maria, decreasing crop yields.

ā€œCoal miners are being denied their pensions while coal barons are being bailed out by the federal government,ā€ she said. The message of Bernie 2020 is that youā€™re already paying for it.

Later that day, Ocasio-Cortez and Sanders spoke to a crowd of a few thousand at a field house in Coralville, near the University of Iowa campus. Sanders gear was in abundance, but he wasnā€™t the main draw for everyone. Caleigh Stanier, a high school junior, told me she came for Ocasio-Cortez, not Sanders.

ā€œI admire her charisma,ā€ she said. Sheā€™d watched the congresswomanā€™s Netflix documentary, Break Down the House, and seen some of her stuff on YouTube. She was drawn to a young female politician with the ā€œboldnessā€ to push a program like the Green New Deal.

Ditto for Jordan Mehling. Though sheā€™ll be supporting Sanders for the second time next year, Ocasio-Cortez was the impetus to make the trip down from Minnesota. Watching the young Democratic Socialist challenge Washington political types had been an inspiration. ā€œBefore AOC came into my view, I cared about these things and I liked Bernie because he was standing up for these things that I also believed in, butā€ā€”butā€””Sheā€™s the one who sort of made me feel if she can do it why canā€™t I do something as well?ā€ Here was someone her doing the maximum. ā€œI can at least be doing the minimum.ā€

Jessica Hillman, who had driven out from Chicago to see Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez, saw the congresswoman as something like a generational bat signal.

ā€œWe all wanted to do something meaningful, we all wanted change, but we didnā€™t feel like we had any power,ā€ she said. ā€œWe couldnā€™t connect with other people and then when she came out it was almost like a message that was sent out that connected us all together.ā€

I saw a little girl jumping up and down as Ocasio-Cortez began to talk, and two young women rush into the crowd to get closer. Afterward, supporters flocked to the far side of the hall for handshakes and selfies. I came upon a University of Iowa student named Harry Manaligod excitedly telling a group of friends about shaking the congresswomanā€™s hand.

ā€œI came for Ocasio-Cortez,ā€ Manaligod told me. ā€œSheā€™s like a completely different league. I feel like thereā€™s so many politicians that have made sacrifices to achieve their goals, and I feel like sheā€™s not the kind of person thatā€™s gonna let one thing fall to the wayside to get her goals accomplished.ā€

Further down the line, a grown man walked away grinning. ā€œI canā€™t wash my hand now!ā€ he shouted.

Sandersā€™ core identity is that heā€™s a man who doesnā€™t changeā€”Ocasio-Cortez told the crowd Saturday night that she endorsed him because he had been fighting for people like her before she was born. The consistency is the thing; you hear it again and again. So much so that there is a frustration among supporters that other candidates have profited at his expense by simply appropriating aspects of his agenda.

ā€œEvery candidate is saying what Bernie has been saying,ā€ said Robin Ruetenik of Coralville. ā€œItā€™s a coattail orgy.ā€

But if this campaign turns out different from the last, itā€™ll be because of the subtle ways he and his movement have evolved. In 2016, Sanders was traveling around the country, promising a new day in America that you could only faintly begin to discern. In 2020, the revolution he promised isnā€™t quite so hard to imagineā€”she takes the stage right before him. Thatā€™s its own form of renewable energy.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate