2019 Was a Banner Year for Abortion Laws—and Not the Kind You Think

Anti-abortion legislation got the headlines, but there was an even bigger surge in state-level abortion protections.

People both supporting and opposing abortion protest at the Rhode Island statehouse on March 5.Jennifer McDermott/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

This year will be remembered for an unprecedented red-state assault on reproductive rights. From a wave of early-term abortion bans in the South and Midwest to a host of policies aimed at preventing providers from having open conversations with patients about abortion, conservative state legislators have done everything in their power to limit the right to abortion. But out of the headlines, 2019 was actually a banner year for abortion protections, as progressives in blue states started to fight back and win major legislative battles to protect the rights enshrined in Roe v. Wade. In 2019, more legislation was passed by Democratic statehouses to protect the right to abortion than in the entire previous decade. 

“The idea of protecting and expanding abortion rights access has been issue that has been picking up steam over the past five or so years,” says Elizabeth Nash of the Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive rights research organization that tabulated the pro- and anti-abortion legislation passed this decade. “But now it feels like it actually broke through.” 

Nine states—Illinois, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Maine, California, Nevada, New Jersey, and Hawaii—passed major legislation to protect or expand abortion rights. In total, these states have passed 36 new laws protecting abortion access. While many states expanded rights already on the books, in Illinois, New York, Vermont, and Rhode Island, legislators codified the right to an abortion for the first time, as well as the right to contraception. Although far more states enacted abortion restrictions than protections, the gap between the two has narrowed significantly in the past year, giving hope to progressive politicians that they might not be on the losing side of the abortion battle after all. 

Guttmacher Institute

Few people have been more active in this fight than Gayle Goldin, a state senator from Rhode Island. In June, Rhode Island passed its first pro-choice legislation in more than 40 years. The law, which reaffirms the right to an abortion in case Roe v. Wade is struck down, was a massive victory for progressives who faced an uphill battle against anti-abortion Democratic Party leaders. Democratic House Speaker Nicholas Mattiello called efforts to enshrine the right to an abortion “divisive” and “irrelevant” in a radio interview in 2018

Politicians like Goldin had fought for years to enact abortion rights legislation, but she says it took the election of President Donald Trump and the groundswell of female activism in the state to tip the scales. Goldin says the election also motivated an unprecedented number of women to run for office and work to defend reproductive freedoms.

Vermont, despite having a Republican governor, enacted a law earlier this year recognizing the right to “reproductive choice” and banning government interference in the right “to terminate the individual’s pregnancy.” Prior to passing the legislation, Vermont was “silent on reproductive rights,” explains Ann Pugh, a Democratic state representative. Pugh says that in light of the abortion bans being passed around the country, she and her fellow legislators felt it was important for Vermont to be clear on where it stood on the right to an abortion.

This year, Janet Mills became Maine’s first female governor, and the state passed a law requiring Medicaid and private health insurance plans to cover abortions. That means Mainers are no longer forced to pay out of pocket for abortions, which can cost anywhere from $75 to $15,000. The state also passed a law allowing physician assistants and nurse practitioners to provide surgical abortions. Previously, Maine only had three cities—Augusta, Portland, and Bangor—where patients could access surgical abortions. State Rep. Matt Moonen, believes that allowing more qualified health care professionals to perform abortions will improve access in rural parts of the state. “This should exist everywhere for everyone, wherever they may be,” he says. State Rep. Jay McCreight notes that for many people, nurse practitioners are their primary providers, and allowing people to go to the providers they trust is an important part of ensuring access to abortion.  

As states in the Northeast have moved to protect reproductive freedoms, Illinois has offered itself up as a safe haven for abortion rights among its more hostile neighbors. In adjacent Missouri, regulators have moved to close the state’s only abortion clinic, which would make Missouri the first state since 1974 without an abortion clinic. A final decision from an administrative hearing committee on the clinic’s license isn’t expected until next year. However, Illinois has wasted no time in making itself an option for Missourians in need of care. Earlier this year,  Illinois passed the Reproductive Health Act, which recognizes the right to the full spectrum of reproductive choice, including abortion, contraception, and sterilization. In addition, Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region opened a new 18,000-square-foot mega-clinic in Fairview Heights, 15 miles from the Missouri border. 

Lawmakers in states that have passed abortion protections say they’re not done yet. “We’re not just going to stop at passing a bill that says you have right to an abortion,” says Goldin. “We are going to make sure that our state ensures that people have access to abortion.”

This article has been updated to correct a reference to a new Planned Parenthood clinic in Fairview Heights, IL.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate