Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s Bid to Hide His Finances From Congress

Deutsche Bank must turn over records, judges rule.

Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press via AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A federal appeals court in New York ruled Tuesday that two of Donald Trump’s lenders must comply with subpoenas from congressional investigators seeking details about the president’s personal finances. It’s the latest court defeat for Trump, who has steadfastly refused to cooperate with congressional probes and in this case sued Deutsche Bank and Capital One to force them to ignore the subpoenas. Trump’s attorneys suggested that he will continue to fight the case. But if the banks do turn over details about their relationships with Trump, that information could prove every bit as revealing as the president’s much sought-after tax returns.

When the House Intelligence and Financial Services Committees issued the subpoenas in April, committee leaders said they were looking for evidence of possible money-laundering from eastern Europe or Russia. The Trump family quickly sued the banks, demanding that they not comply with the subpoenas which, they claimed, constituted an abuse of power. The tactic has so far proved unsuccessful, with multiple judges ruling against the Trumps in the run-up to Tuesday’s decision. Trump attorney Jay Sekulow said he was considering an appeal to the US Supreme Court, which recently stayed a separate subpoena for Trump’s financial records issued by the House Oversight Committee. Yet another request for documents from an accounting firm used by the Trumps is also being litigated.

The subpoenas at issue are extremely broad and could reveal an enormous amount of information about how the Trumps have done business over the several decades. Deutsche Bank is, by far, the president’s biggest lender, with more than $360 million in outstanding loans and a total of about $2 billion in loans to Trump and his family since the 1990s. Part of the reason the bank lent Trump so much money for business projects was because he agreed to use the institution for much of his personal bankingā€”his investment portfolios and checking accounts, for instance. His daughter Ivanka and her husband Jared Kushner have also done business with the German bank. All of which means the bank knows a tremendous amount about the family’s finances.

One of the most significant sources of information in the records could be financial details the family provided to Deutsche when it applied for new loans. Typically a bank wants to know everything it can about a borrowerā€”including any potential risks, particularly what other debts the borrower has that might interfere with the bank’s chances of getting repaid. This could shed a lot of light on some of the more mysterious aspects of the Trump family businesses. For example, a recent Mother Jones investigation uncovered new information about a $50 million loan involving Trump:

Donald Trumpā€™s massive debtsā€”he owes hundreds of millions of dollarsā€”are the subject of continuous congressional and journalistic scrutiny. But for years, one Trump loan has been particularly mystifying: a debt of more than $50 million that Trump claims he owes to one of his own companies. According to tax and financial experts, the loan, which Trump has never fully explained, might be part of a controversial tax avoidance scheme known as debt parking. Yet a Mother Jones investigation has uncovered information that raises questions about the very existence of this loan, presenting the possibility that this debt was concocted as a ploy to evade income taxesā€”a move that could constitute tax fraud.

Deutsche Bank helped finance the same Chicago tower deal that this loan was apparently connected to, so it’s possible that the bank has relevant information it could share with Congress.

Another enduring mystery of Trump’s finances is where he summoned the cash to purchase his two Scottish resortsā€”as well as the tens of millions of dollars needed to keep them operating. Both facilities have run heavy losses under his ownership. We may finally learn exactly how he’s managing to keep the lights on.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate