What’s Inside Democratic Candidates’ Plans to Spend Trillions Fighting Climate Change

The good, the bad, and the Inslee

Nearly 85 percent of Democrats and Democrat-leaning independets say they believe climate change is a major threat to the country. Democratic presidential candidates have matched that concern with robust climate proposals that promise to spend trillions to slow the damage. While all of the candidates below support the Green New Deal and want the United States to reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, they differ in how to get there—and how much it will cost.

Joe Biden After drawing flak for what his adviser described as a “middle ground” approach to climate policy, Biden unveiled a call for a Clean Energy Revolution inspired by the Green New Deal. The former veep wants to invest in biofuels, smart grids, nuclear reactors, and a “second great railroad revolution.” He pledges to use international action to rein in China, which continues to fund new coal projects. Price tag: $1.7 trillion over 10 years

Elizabeth Warren True to form, Warren has not one but several climate plans focused on public lands, the military, trade, and manufacturing. She has said that climate change might be America’s “biggest challenge yet” and wants to spend $400 billion for a Green Apollo Program centered on R&D, and $100 billion for a Green Marshall Plan that would help other countries purchase American clean energy products. She’d also quintuple funding for FEMA programs to protect communities on the front lines of climate impacts. Price tag: $3 trillion over 10 years

Bernie Sanders An early supporter of the Green New Deal, Sanders sets a high bar with his plan, $2 trillion of which would subsidize electric vehicles for low-income families and small businesses. He wants to invest in energy storage and drive the price for electric cars down to $18,000. He’d also allocate $160 billion to climate-resilient agriculture practices that store more carbon on the soil. He aims to reach total decarbonization by 2050. Price tag: $16.3 trillion over 10 years
 

Pete Buttigieg Calling climate change “a life-and-death issue,” Buttigieg aims to develop the means to remove 1 gigaton of atmospheric CO2 per year by 2040, and by then would require all new vehicles to be emission-free, and ships and aircraft to be net-zero. He’s proposed a $250 billion Clean Energy Bank to fund energy projects in disadvantaged communities, and another $250 billion for clean infrastructure around the world. He supports a carbon fee and dividend system, which would distribute the revenue of a fossil fuel tax to all Americans in the form of rebates. Price tag: $1.5 trillion over 10 years

Andrew Yang The entrepreneur offers big ideas like spending $50 billion on thorium-based nuclear reactors and fusion technologies. A carbon fee and dividend program would help fund his universal basic income proposal, while $3 trillion in loans would help individuals buy geothermal pumps, solar panels, and more. He’d also explore lesser-known ideas like packing gravel against glaciers to slow their melting, and geoengineering techniques like sulfate aerosols and even space mirrors—“as a last resort.” Price tag: $4.9 trillion over 20 years

Jay Inslee Though he dropped out in August, the Washington governor is widely credited with bringing climate to the forefront of the primary race. Ideas central to his plan, such as paying farmers to practice carbon farming and restore public lands, have since been adopted by Warren, Sanders, and Harris. Price tag: $9 trillion over 10 years

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate