The Last Question in Tonight’s Debate Did Exactly What It Was Intended to Do

The men proposed gifts. The women asked forgiveness.

Justin Sullivan/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

It was supposed to be a cutesy, holiday-themed ending to a debate scheduled dangerously close to Christmas—”in the spirit of the season,” PBS’s Judy Woodruff explained. For the final question of the night, Woodruff gave the seven Democrats on Thursday night’s debate stage an either/or: “A candidate from whom you would ask forgiveness for something—maybe that was said tonight—or a candidate to whom you’d like to give a gift.” 

The audience snickered. Businessman Andrew Yang, up first, was speechless, biting his lip as he silently pleaded with his hands. “We could do a labor action and just go on strike on this one, Andrew,” Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren volunteered.

Finally, Yang spoke. “I don’t think I have much to ask forgiveness for—you all can correct me on this,” he began. He opted for a gift. “I would love to give each of you a copy of my book,” a tome outlining the logic of the “freedom dividend,” his signature proposal for a universal basic income. “If you like data, this book is for you.”

Pete Buttigieg went next, offering a wholesome pivot on the gift option. “We know what a gift it would be for the future of the country for literally anybody up here to become president of the United States compared to what we got,” he said. Sanders opted to give a “very, very different vision” of “a nation based on love and compassion,” while billionaire philanthropist Tom Steyer offered “the gift of teamwork.” Former vice president Joe Biden volunteered something along the lines of making everyone’s lives better. (Buttigieg and Sanders also mentioned that they, too, are the authors of giftable books!)

And who asked for forgiveness, you wonder? The two women on the debate stage: Warren and Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar. “I know there are times when I get really worked up, and sometimes I get a little hot,” Warren said. “I don’t really mean to.” Klobuchar took responsibility not only for her emotions, but the reactions of others to those emotions. “I’d ask for forgiveness anytime any of you get mad at me,” Klobuchar said, fighting back tears. “I can be blunt, but I am doing this because I think it is so important to pick the right candidate here.”

There’s something inspiring about seeing candidates talk about their human moments. There’s something enraging about seeing women candidates be the only ones who do it. This is especially true given that Warren’s and Klobuchar’s respective emotional states have been a subject of fixation among male candidates and the media alike. Last month, Warren endured a news cycle that relentlessly questioned her alleged “anger” after Biden accused Warren of maintaing an “angry unyielding viewpoint,” something media critics quickly identified as sneaky sexism. A round of stories detailing Klobuchar’s alleged acts of rage directed toward her staff raised important questions about her fitness for office. Whether those questions would’ve been raised at all if she were a man is another matter altogether. 

Neither female candidate let forgiveness be their last beat on the question. Warren used her answer as a launching pad to talk about her personal, emotional reaction to stories she heard on the campaign trail, from “people who are really down to their last moments.” Klobuchar reinforced the notion she gets “worked up” because she cares so much about a candidate’s responsibility to “bring people along, not shut them out.”

At the end of his remarks, Buttigieg said that his fellow Democrats should rally around the eventual nominee, without doing too much damage in the process. “Let’s make sure there’s not too much to ask for forgiveness for when that day comes,” Buttigieg said. Everyone would do well to heed that advice.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate