Trump Claims He Wants Nothing to Do With the UK’s NHS. No One’s Buying It.

His radioactive presence is only fueling concerns that the beloved institution is under threat.

Alberto Pezzali/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

It was only a few months ago in June, during his first state visit to the United Kingdom, when President Donald Trump could barely contain his enthusiasm for the Queen of England. “The meeting with the Queen was incredible,” he told Fox News. “We had automatic chemistry.” 

But en route to Buckingham Palace on Tuesday, an undeniable cloud blotted out the summer’s optimism. One reason is that Trump isn’t the marquee guest. The Queen is hosting a banquet for members of NATO in honor of the 70th anniversary of the military alliance Trump has repeatedly attacked and threatened to cut US funding from. And as evidenced by a tweet announcing his arrival to the UK Monday evening, NATO’s position as the focus of Trump’s fury has been replaced by Congress and the looming threat of impeachment back home.

For many Britons, however, the most critical difference between the two visits could be seen in the protests greeting the unpopular American president this time around. Shortly before the banquet began, doctors and nurses from the National Health Service gathered in Trafalgar Square to make their way to Buckingham Palace, many holding “Trump: Hands Off Our NHS” signs. They were referring to the president’s June comments suggesting that the NHS could be on the table for a US-UK trade deal in post-Brexit negotiations, and the further revelation last week from leaked documents that indicated conversations between British and US officials that included the NHS as a part of trade negotiations. The overwhelmingly negative reaction to the remarks forced Trump to backpedal in June, and on Tuesday morning ahead of the Queen’s reception, he told reporters that he wanted “nothing to do with” the NHS, even if it were handed to him on a “silver platter.”

No one demonstrating on Tuesday appeared convinced. “Trump has been very, very clear that he is hopeful that if we go through with Brexit and have to strike a trade deal with the USA, that he is very keen to get his hands on our NHS,” Katy Sutcliffe, an academic at the University of College London, told me as she held a poster that read, “Keep your tiny hands off our NHS.”

“It’s Trump. I don’t trust, honestly.”

Both Sutcliffe and her colleague Meena Khatwa agreed that Trump should “absolutely” be impeached. “He’s not fit to govern, really,” Khatwa said. “He’s a danger to society, and he’s a danger to everyone out there.”

While Trump’s previous trips to London attracted protests with larger turnouts, Tuesday’s demonstrations appeared to carry a far more personal, if not anguished, resonance for its participants. Here was a foreign leader, amid a fast-approaching general election with generational consequences, whose mere presence for them signified a potential threat to the one British institution more beloved than the Queen herself. And healthcare workers, a typically apolitical group, were at the frontlines sounding the alarm.

David Christie, a local resident who protested, was one of several to point to last week’s leaked papers. “They have now published documents which actually show that there have been months of ongoing talks about what America would like,” Christie explained, “and America is in a much stronger position than we are, as we’re about to leave our strong allies in Europe.”

“In my family, there were three children with quite a rare disease,” he continued. “My father often mentioned the fact that the care that we were given from a very early age, we didn’t pay a penny for. So [the NHS] has been something I’ve been very thankful for, and others in my family too.”

For Elsa Ochoa, an NHS interpreter who moved to London from northern Spain more than 30 years ago, the political situation in both the US and Great Britain recalled her time living through the Franco dictatorship. “I know very well what fascism is like and I can see that rising all over the world,” she said. “I’m very scared.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate