Biden’s Closing Iowa Argument: Impeachment Shows “How Scared Trump Is of Running Against Me”

This isn’t how elections are supposed to work. But Biden thinks it can help him.

Joe Biden campaigns in Iowa ahead of Monday's caucuses.Jerker Ivarsson/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

If Joe Biden does come back in the polls to win the Iowa caucuses next week, he should send an edible arrangement or something to Joni Ernst. Maybe you saw this. On Monday, at the end of another long day in the Senate impeachment trial, the Republican senator from Iowa brought the subject back to the man who, in many ways, the entire Ukraine scandal was really about.

“Iowa caucuses are this next Monday evening,” she told a group of reporters, breaking into a huge grin. “I’m really interested to see how this discussion today informs and influences the Iowa caucus voters, those Democratic caucus-goers. Will they be supporting Vice President Biden at this point?”

The Biden campaign was so pleased with the comment they made a video about it. Ernst, as Biden put on Wednesday, was “screaming the quiet part into the bullhorn.” Republicans’ handling of the impeachment investigation and trial—their frequent insinuations of corrupt behavior and suggestions that he and his son should testify—and the “corruption” scandal that precipitated it, were about sabotaging Joe Biden, he said. And with just a few days left before a contest on which he’s placing an increasing amount of importance, Biden wants everyone in Iowa to know.

After months of treading delicately around the issue, the former vice president weighed in very deliberately in a series of stops in the western part of the state this week, spending more time talking about the impeachment trial (and his role in it) than about any of the policy fights that have dominated the campaign until now. Biden’s ads talk about how well he performs against Trump in head-to-head polls, but the impeachment drama illustrates his point far better than they any Quinnipiac survey.

He got to impeachment about midway through his remarks at each stop, after (as is his wont) an extended riff on “character.” And then he turned to Ernst.

“By the way, did anyone see what Joni Ernst said the other day?”

The crowd began to boo.

“Whoooooa!” he said, dropping his voice for comic effect. “Joni, Joni, Joni! She spilled the beans! You know, she’s just come out and said it! The whole impeachment trial for Trump is just about a political hit job to smear me, from the standpoint of Joni and all of her friends. It’s how scared Trump is of running against me.”

Biden looked down at his notes and began to annotate Ernst’s comments for the benefit of the audience. “Now look, here’s what she said: ‘The Iowa caucuses are next Monday, I’m really interested to see how this discussion’—meaning the discussion about me on the floor of the Senate with Republican defense attorneys for the president—’how this discussion today’—two days ago—’this discussion today informs and influences Iowa caucus-goers. Will they be supporting Vice President Biden at this point?”

Someone in the crowd shouted back. “Yes!”

“I tell ya what!,” he said. “That’s just flat-out acknowledging, we’ve been doing everything we can do to keep Biden from becoming the nominee. And guess what? We tried it in Iraq and it’s not working—excuse me, in Iran—we tried it in Ukraine, almost got us into a war in Iran, and people got hurt in Iraq. Folks, I mean this is like something out of Alice in Wonderland!”

But folks, Biden was not done. Next he took aim at Florida Republican Sen. Rick Scott, who recently starting running ads in Iowa essentially making the same argument about Biden that led to Trump’s impeachment—alleging (with no apparent evidence) that Biden had strong-armed Ukraine to protect his son.

“Well, God love him, as my mother said,” Biden continued. “He’s so interested, a senator from Florida, as to whether or not I should win an Iowa caucus! Isn’t that fascinating? I guess if I had that much money, I’d spend it on anything I could. I don’t know! But, pretty amazing. All that seems to me is, think about it—from Florida, sitting in Washington, decides to start running negative ads, just a couple days before the Iowa caucus. Now, what do ya think on that?”

Biden events can be staid affairs. He has a tendency—and really, this shouldn’t be news to anyone—to ramble in a soft sort of monotone about minutiae that seems to lull the audience and maybe even him to sleep. But he is never more lively than when he is riffing about people he considers idiots. And in that sense, impeachment has given him the perfect punching bag, one that just so happens to be, in his view, validation of his entire theory of the race: Republicans fear Joe Biden. Don’t believe him? Just turn on the television.

Attendees I spoke to at Biden events were following impeachment closely, on TV or the radio or (in one case) in their dorm room via an Amazon Echo Dot, and angry with the way the process had unfolded. (Though a few thought Biden should have offered to testify.)

Wayne Head, whom I met before Biden’s speech in Council Bluffs, was so angry about something Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) had said at the trial that he could remember the exact timestamp.

“At 10 minutes after 4 this afternoon, Ted Cruz sent one of those notes to the chief justice,” he told me. Cruz wanted to know two things, as Head recalled: Did Biden work with the whistleblower when he went to Ukraine in 2015? And did the whistleblower ever work with Hunter Biden?

“It was a loaded question,” Head complained. “It was meant to be hurtful. It was meant to throw out negative aspersions against Joe Biden on national television in the well of the Senate. It was despicable!”

Biden puts an upbeat spin on it, but it’s worth remembering that this is not how it’s supposed to work. George W. Bush did some ugly things to win reelection in 2004, but he did not attempt to get Ukraine to open up an investigation into John and Alexandra Kerry. (The fact that I had to Google who John Kerry’s children are sort of speaks to this.) Barack Obama didn’t wield the State Department against the Republican field in 2012. The closest parallel might be the Republican Congress’ endless dragging of Hillary Clinton over Benghazi, but Benghazi really did happen, and the disinformation and foreign interference that made 2016 infamous got going much later. This is the first caucus operating fully under the cloud of Trumpism, in which a sitting president can use his office to manipulate the political landscape however he sees fit. Trump has already poisoned the well.

Trying to game these things out from a caucus perspective can get your mind all twisted up. Maybe this really does mean Republicans fear Biden most. Maybe they want to suggest they fear Biden because the backlash will give him a boost and protect them from Sanders, the man they truly fear. Maybe Trump just didn’t think that hard about any of this before he went and committed crimes, because he has the attention span of a squirrel and no clear sense of boundaries. But whatever the case, Biden is 2020’s first target of election interference and maybe not the last. At least, he hopes, it just might help him win Iowa.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate