Bloomberg Intends to Release His Tax Returns, Upping the Pressure on Trump

Trump claims his finances are too complicated, but Bloomberg is an even wealthier New York billionaire.

Photo by Anthony Behar/Sipa USA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A lawsuit by House Democrats to force the administration to hand over Donald Trump’s tax returns to investigators was put on hold by a federal judge on Tuesday. But the president may soon feel pressure to disclose more about his personal financesā€”and separate himself from his business empireā€”from a different source: the other New York billionaire running for president.

Michael Bloomberg, the former Republican-turned-independent New York mayor and current Democratic presidential candidate, is planning to release his tax returns if he receives the Democratic nomination for president, says a senior Bloomberg campaign aide.

“Heā€™ll release his returns,” says Tim O’Brien, a former columnist and executive editor at Bloomberg Opinion and Trump biographer, “and he has every intention of handling this in a completely different way than Donald Trump has, because he understands the transparency around his finances and the absence of financial conflicts of interest are important for the president of the United States.”

Trump, who is estimated by Forbes magazine to have a net worth of about $3.1 billion, has steadfastly refused to release his tax returns or reveal many details of his personal finances. The sole concession to transparency has been an annual release of the personal financial documents that all top federal employees must fill out, which listsā€”in broad rangesā€”assets and debts and some information on income. That document, which Trump is expected to file again in May, has raised new questions about Trump’s finances in the pastā€”for example, a $50 million loan the president claims to have purchased years ago, which does not appear to be real, suggesting that Trump may have committed tax fraud. Releasing his actual tax returns would not only help investigators determine whether the president has truly defrauded the government, but would also shed light on how much money Trump truly makes and how much he pays in taxes.

After Democrats took control of the House, Ways and Means Committee chair Richard Neal (D-Mass.) began pursuing a copy of the president’s tax returns, invoking a law that requires the Internal Revenue Service to provide copies of tax returns if requested by Congress. The Trump administration has refused to cooperate, and on Tuesday, a federal judge put the fight on hold until another case is decided, involving former White House counsel Don McGahn and whether he can be made to testify in Congress’ impeachment inquiry. The judge’s ruling may give the president some breathing room; the McGahn case could drag on for months. But he might soon face peer pressure from another billionaire whose willingness to reveal financial details undermines many of Trump’s arguments about protecting his own.

One of several reasons Trump has given for refusing to release his tax returns is that, given his wealth, they are too complicated for Americans to understand. “It is big,” he told Politico. “And it is complex. And it is probably feet high. It is a very complex instrument. And I think that people would not understand it.ā€

But Bloomberg, who Forbes estimates has a net worth of $59,5 billion, is listed as the 8th richest person in the world (to Trump’s 715th) and presumably has tax returns at least as complicated as Trump’s. O’Brien, the Bloomberg aide, says his boss is committed to releasing his actual returns. 

As it happens, O’Brien wrote a book about Trump in the early 2000s that alleged the president is not actually a billionaire, and he was sued by Trump over the claim. During the course of the lawsuitā€”which was eventually dismissedā€”O’Brien said he was allowed to see copies of the president’s tax returns, though he was not permitted to disclose details about them.

O’Brien did say that Bloomberg will likely withhold some details of his tax returns. Typically, presidential candidates self-censor some personal details, though the key informationā€”income and effective tax rate paidā€”is usually included.

While serving as the mayor of New York, Bloomberg was famously reluctant to share details of his taxes:

In 2001, when he first ran for mayor, Bloomberg refused to release his IRS filings even as his rivals disclosed theirs. Asked why his competitors would release their returns but he wouldnā€™t, Bloomberg reportedly snarled that it was easy for other candidates who didnā€™t have his wealth.

ā€œThat is fine,ā€ he told reporters. ā€œThey donā€™t make anything.ā€

Instead, Bloomberg allowed reporters to view summaries of his tax informationā€”in person, for a limited period of time. O’Brien said that will not be the way Bloomberg handles it if he is the nominee, opting instead for public release of actual returns.

The first insights into Bloomberg’s wealth will likely come in early February. February 4 is the deadline for Bloomberg to file his own personal financial disclosure, which would lay out his finances in ranges, as Trump’s disclosures have done. 

Bloomberg could also up the ante for Trump to separate himself from his businesses, which are riddled with conflicts of interest. The president has claimed that his business holdings are too hard to unwind. But Bloomberg plans to do exactly what Trump says he can’t if he becomes the Democratic nominee.

“If heā€™s the nominee, he intends to place the business in a blind trust, so he can move forward to a sale,” O’Brien says. “And the conditions of the sale are, he doesnā€™t want to sell it to a private equity or a foreign buyer, to protect the [Bloomberg News] newsroom.”

Before his inauguration, Trump put his businesses into a revocable trust in his nameā€”a financial mechanism that essentially changed nothing about his ultimate ownership of the companies and allowed him to continue to withdraw money.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate