Republicans in Congress Urge Supreme Court to Reconsider Roe

In a brief to the court, more than 200 members cited the “unworkability of the ‘right to abortion.'”

Republican Sens. Mitt Romney of Utah and Kevin Cramer of North Dakota both signed a brief urging the Supreme Court to reconsider Roe v. Wade.J. Scott Applewhite/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

More than 200 Republicans in Congress are asking the Supreme Court to reconsider the landmark abortion case Roe v. Wade, which established the constitutional right to an abortion in 1973. 

The request came as a part of an amicus brief in support of an anti-abortion law in Louisiana that will be the subject of oral arguments before the court in March. The case, June Medical Services v. Rebekah Gee, will be the first abortion case before the Supreme Court since the confirmation of Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. The law requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at local hospitals, a stipulation that the clinic at the center of the case argues would leave Louisiana with only one abortion provider for more than 4 million residents. 

In their letter, the members of Congress urge the court to consider overturning both Roe and its 1992 decision in Casey v. Planned Parenthood, which upheld the basic principle of Roe but allowed for greater abortion restrictions. They argue that the Louisiana case “illustrates the unworkability of the ‘right to abortion’ found in Roe v. Wade…and the need for the Court to take up the issue of whether Roe and Casey should be reconsidered and, if appropriate, overruled.” 

Thirty-nine Republican senators signed the brief, including former presidential candidates Mitt Romney of Utah, Ted Cruz of Texas, and Marco Rubio of Florida. Of the 13 Republican senators who declined to sign the letter, eight are up for reelection in 2020, including Cory Gardner (R-Colo.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), and Martha McSally (R-Ariz.), who are all locked in close races.

Only 4 of the 39 senators and 8 of the 168 representatives who signed the letter were women. In the Senate, there were more men named John than women who signed the letter.

The brief received more than just Republican support. Two Democrats in the House—Dan Lipinski of Illinois and Collin Peterson of Minnesota—signed the brief. Lipinski, an anti-abortion hardliner in a safe blue district, is currently facing a primary challenge from Marie Newman, whose campaign has received support from abortion rights groups such as EMILY’s List and Planned Parenthood Action Fund. Lipinski was also the sole Democratic member not to co-sponsor the Equality Act, an LGBTQ rights bill introduced in March 2019. Peterson, a longtime conservative Democrat, was one of two Democrats to vote against both counts of impeachment against President Donald Trump last month.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate