Biden Previews The Road Ahead, Blasts Bernie Again Over Gun Vote

Joe Biden

Matt York / Associated Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Thursday is a light day on the Nevada campaign trail, with no events scheduled in the afternoon for any of the major candidates. (Everyone’s presumably getting some R&R ahead of Tom Steyer’s big concert with TLC.) But this morning, Joe Biden issued a last-minute advisory: he’d be speaking at a community in Las Vegas to “lay out his vision,” as campaigns say, about defeating the National Rifle Association.

But it may have said more about his plan to defeat Bernie Sanders. If the debate at the Paris casino was mostly about ganging up on Michael Bloomberg, Biden’s event was more of a re-set—if he is going to win the nomination, he is also going to have to overtake the Vermont senator, if not here in Nevada, than definitely next week in South Carolina. On Thursday, he briefly tried to demonstrate how. If it sounds familiar, it’s because it’s the same argument Hillary Clinton used against Sanders ahead of the first-in-the-south primary four years ago: hammer loudly and persistently on gun control.

After being introduced by Rep. Steven Horsford, who lost his own father to gun violence, the former vice president ripped into “everybody out there who says ‘my thoughts and prayers are with you'” and touted his past work in enacting an assault rifle ban and the Brady Bill.

“It just takes a little bit of backbone to stand up to the thugs,” he said. But he wasn’t just there to talk about what he’d done and would like to do; he also wanted to talk about what his opponent had done.

“It’s long past time that we correct one of the most egregious special interest giveaways the United States Congress has ever engaged in,” Biden said. He was referring to liability immunity for gun manufacturers against lawsuits from victims of gun violence, which Sanders voted against as a congressman in 2005.

“We don’t grant that kind of immunity to anybody else,” he continued. “Imagine if I stood up here today and said ‘I voted to give immunity to the tobacco companies.’ ‘I voted to give immunity…to drug manufacturers who poured nine billion opioids out on the market.’ Imagine—imagine if I stood here and said to y’all that ‘I…voted for giving immunity to oil companies for pollution and the damage they do to the groundwater supply, to the air, etc.’ Folks, it’s just flat-out immoral.”

In case that wasn’t clear enough, Biden singled out his opponent by name. “Too many Republicans, and some Democrats, like Bernie Sanders,” opposed the gun-control measures Biden supported. Sanders, he noted, “voted five times against the Brady Bill that I was passing. Five times!”

Biden, as he often does, recounted the tragedies that have shaped his life—the loss of loved ones to a car accident and cancer. But government responded to automobile fatalities with safety regulations, and combatted cancer with research. “Why are guns different?,” he asked. “Because of cowardice. Because of cowards. Cowards who are afraid to take on these special interests because they’re too powerful.”

As he turned to leave, reporters asked Biden several versions of the same basic question—was he saying that Sanders was immoral? Biden didn’t answer, but as he paused to let the activists who had stood behind him to exit through the side door, he half-turned toward the cameras and spoke up.

“I do think his views have changed,” he said. “And I’m happy for that.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate