How Acronym Pitched Itself to Potential Investors: “We Don’t Do Hyperbole. We Call BS.”

A leaked 2018 letter from the company that launched the company that launched the Iowa caucuses into chaos.

Screenshot of Acronym's website

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The letter was sent to prospective investors not long ago, the prose so redolent of disruptomatic DC consultant patter that lanyards practically hang from every word. ā€œWe donā€™t do hyperbole,” it reads. “We call BS. We say when our programs work. We say when they donā€™t because being dishonest or evasive tells us you have something to hide.”

It goes on a little later: “Just don’t measure our success by how many Politico articles we’re mentioned in. You’ll be disappointed.”

The letter, obtained by Mother Jones, was likely sent in 2018 on behalf of a nonprofit called Acronym, which today is infamous for having launched the tech company that launched the app that launched the Iowa Democratic caucuses into a days-long spectacle of incompetence. In the days since the caucuses went sideways in part because of its undertested app, Acronym has been evasive, if not dishonest. It has been mentioned in at least a dozen Politico articles, and indeed no one has taken the media attention as a measure of Acronym’s success.

So what is Acronym? It’s a lot of things, but in public it bills itself as “a nonprofit organization committed to building power and digital infrastructure for the progressive movement.” Its CEO is a well-connected political operative, Tara McGowan, and at the time the letter was written it had a “team of 15 (100 percent millennial, 90 percent women) strategists, data nerds, creatives, Facebook ninjas and organizers.” Acronym, founded in 2017, has a PAC and a digital strategy firm, Lockwood Strategy, and of course it has the political technology company, called Shadow, which is staffed by former Clinton staffers and some developers who had just completed coding boot camp a few months ago.

Acronym swears that Shadow is an independent company, but that seems a little dubious, given that Acronym is the sole investor in Shadow and shares a WeWork space with the company, that Shadow’s founder previously worked at Acronym, and that Acronym at one point scrubbed mentions from its website of having launched Shadow (the references were later restored). 

The company declined to comment on the record about the letter, which is transcribed at the bottom of the page. Check out the whole thing to get a full taste of its swaggering tautologies and nothingburgers. Bolded headers like “WHAT COMES NEXT” and “WHAT DOES THAT MEAN” help guide even the most inept rich person through the thickets of startup ideation. Itā€™s as if Axios had been commissioned to write a business prospectus.

Here are couple of our favorite bits:

We invest in digital-first tools and tactics that reach voters where they spend their time – online + on their phones with creative content that catches their attention and inspires them to act. Like pierogis that people want to eat with their friends after the polls.

There was apparently a link beneath that last sentence but it’s gone dead in the version of the letter we’ve obtained. We’ll just have to imagine whatever tableau we were meant to see of bright young people eating pierogis after doing the hard work of punching some names into a voting booth. Pierogis are one way to reach voters. Another way is to improve the material conditions of their lives by way of political candidates who do not treat voters as an undifferentiated mass of white yuppies.

The letter continues:

We donā€™t duplicate efforts. We identify gaps, then we fill them. We understand the power of coordination and we encourage and facilitate it where we can to maximize limited resources and impact.

Read that again. Yes, thatā€™s right. It doesnā€™t mean anything. You identify problems and fix them? Impressive!! You work with other people to fix problems efficiently? Even more impressive! This is a lot of words to just say ā€œweā€™ll do a good job.ā€

Here’s the full thing. We retyped the letter at the request of our source. 

WHATā€™S THE STORY?

ACRONYM was incorporated in the wake of the 2016 presidential election, but the idea of ACRONYM as a solution to problems that have persisted within the Democratic party long before Donald Trump was elected President was manifested many months before.

Tara McGowan, a political strategist who helped build and run three of the largest digital programs and teams in the progressive movement over the past six years, witnessed firsthand how a broken campaign model and the veteral strategists who continued to subsidize it were holding the Democratic Party back from investing in the tools and tactics needed to win campaigns in a digital age. 2016 wasnā€™t the first election Democrats lost because of an obvious miscalculation around how people and technology evolved, but ACRONYM exists to ensure it will be one of the last.

WHAT IS ACRONYM?

ACRONYM is a progressive organization that is building the digital infrastructure the Democratic party has failed to invest in ā€“ but desperately needs ā€“ in order to build lasting political power at every level of government.

BUT WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?

For starters, itā€™s important to remember that ā€œdigitalā€ is an adjective, not a noun, and when you understand that, youā€™re closer to understanding ACRONYM and the programs and resources we deploy.

To us, digital infrastructure represents three core assets that we believe are essential to running and winning electoral campaigns in todayā€™s word [sic]:
ā€” Digital capacity: human talent, expertise, and time
ā€” Digital tools: to organize, disseminate messaging, listen, engage, fundraise, mobilize
ā€” Digital media: organic, paid, creative, distributed, earned

ACRONYM is investing in each of these core campaign assets not only because itā€™s the smart thing to do, but because itā€™s the necessary thing to do if we want to build political power ā€“ and no other organization is doing it.

WHAT HAVE YOU ACTUALLY ACCOMPLISHED?

Since our inception in March 2017, our incredible team of 15 (100 percent millennial, 90 percent women) strategists, data nerds, creatives, Facebook ninjas and organizers has:

ā€” Raised over $8 million to fuel our work
ā€” Coordinated over $3 million in digital investment to sweep over 18 statewide + local seats in Virginia
ā€” Registered over 1,000 new voters in Virginia who had their voting rights restored by Governor McAuliffe just months prior
ā€” Ran over 12 targeted digital media programs to help over 28 Democrats win elections across five states.
ā€” Worked with over 27 progressive partners to accelerate their digital programs and investments.

WHAT COMES NEXT?

Hereā€™s where + how weā€™re investing this cycle to flip this script:

ā€” Releasing an open-source organizer guide to over 50 digital organizing tools to help progressive campaigns and organizations make smart investments that will maximize resources to move the needle.
ā€” Training over 5,000 organizers across 21 statewide campaigns on digital organization tools and best practices to build our digital talent bench for 2020.
ā€” Deploying over 100 targeted digital media campaigns to fip 11 chambers in 10 states, mobilizing thousands, to vote down the ballot to elect our new Democratic bench and shore up statehouses critical to redistricting efforts.

TELL ME MORE.

Our specific programs for this cycle will certainly define our impact in the short term, but we believe our philosophy and approach to this work are equally important and are what we really make Acronym stand out in a crowd. Here’s a bit more about what we do — and what we don’t do:

ā€” We donā€™t burn your money on television ads. Or think itā€™s enough to serve a billion impressions of unresponsive ads on the internet. We invest in digital-first tools and tactics that reach voters where they spend their timeā€”online+ on their phones with creative content that catches their attention and inspires them to act. Like pierogis that people want to eat with their friends after the polls.

ā€” We donā€™t duplicate efforts. We identify gaps, then we fill them. We understand the power of coordination, and we encourage and facilitate it where we can to maximize limited resources and impact. See how this approach moved the needle in Virginia last year.

ā€” We donā€™t only focus on the trees ā€” or in this case the midterms. We do plan on helping Democrats win big this cycle ā€” focused primarily on first-time candidates running for state office ā€” but we also understand that if we donā€™t capitalize on the wave of enthusiasm we are seeing on our side this cycle to get more voters to the polls + on the rolls, weā€™ve thrown away the only shot weā€™ve got at getting Trump out of office in 2020. Thatā€™s why weā€™re focused on down ballot candidates who represent or bench for the future and have a plan to train 5000 organizers across the country on how to use social media to move the needle in November.

ā€”We donā€™t do hyperbole. We call BS. We say when our programs work. We say when they donā€™t because being dishonest or evasive tells us you have something to hide. So we stay humble and focused and we like it that way because it keeps us scrappy and smart. And scrappy and smart means we win more elections for less money. Just don’t measure our success by how many Politico articles we’re mentioned in. You’ll be disappointed.

HOW CAN I HELP?

In order to scale the impact of our work in the short term, while taking on the slow-burn of modernizing our campaign playbook writ large, our team is aiming to raise $8 million before May 31. With $2 million committed already, we are going to need your help to raise or write the rest.

If you are interested in learning more about our programs or approach, or are feeling the very real sense of urgency and are simply ready to make an investment in ACRONYM right away, please get in touch with Tara by email or phone ā€” [phone number redacted].

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate