The Men Leading Trump’s Coronavirus Response Should Terrify You

From Azar’s role in price-gouging insulin to the president’s extreme anti-science record.

Gripas Yuri/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

President Donald Trump has been scrambling to project confidence and cool-as-a-cucumber calm after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a warning earlier this week that outbreaks of the coronavirus in the United States are inevitable. His various statements have rattled many, sparking worries that Trump is undermining government scientists to prevent further stock market declines ahead of 2020 presidential election.

But the chaotic messaging that exploded into public view this week isn’t the only thing that should trouble Americans. Look no further than the men leading the White House response—Vice President Mike Pence, Health and Human Services Alex Azar, National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow, and, of course, the president himself—and serious questions about the administration’s ability to handle a public health emergency become clear. Let’s take a look at why:

Mike Pence

The vice president, who has been tapped to oversee the coronavirus response despite lacking a scientific background, has a long record of flat-out rejecting science. As Mother Jones has previously noted, as governor of Indiana, Pence “ignored public health officials’ warnings about the state’s HIV outbreak”—delaying for months before finally agreeing to experts’ pleas for him to approve needle-exchange programs designed to stem the crisis. His efforts to destroy the Affordable Care Act and Planned Parenthood have made him a hero in evangelical circles, while his embrace of debunked science—including the false theories that “smoking doesn’t kill” and “global warming is a myth”—is well-documented. 

Nevertheless, Trump on Wednesday declared Pence the perfect man for the job. 

Alex Azar

The Health and Human Services secretary is heading the government’s coronavirus task force. But it’s Azar’s storied career as a drug company executive and role in doubling the price of insulin as president of the pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly that have some concerned. In November 2017, Democrats were outraged by Trump’s choice to lead the department, arguing that Azar’s close ties to the pharma industry were disqualifying. They also cited his antipathy for the Affordable Care Act and women’s reproductive rights when opposing Azar’s appointment. The New York Times reported at the time of Azar’s confirmation:

Senator Patty Murray of Washington, the senior Democrat on the Senate health committee, said Wednesday: “I’m alarmed that Mr. Azar believes a woman’s employer should be able to decide, based on ideology, whether or not her birth control should be covered. I’m alarmed by his extreme and out-of-touch views on Roe v. Wade,” the 1973 Supreme Court decision that established a constitutional right to abortion.

Senator Tim Kaine, Democrat of Virginia, explained why he had decided to oppose Mr. Azar: “The Trump administration’s determination to destroy the Affordable Care Act through executive action has destabilized our health care system and threatened coverage for millions. I fear Alex Azar could make things even worse.”

Lawmakers were similarly stunned this week when Azar refused to promise that a coronavirus vaccine would be made affordable for all Americans:

Larry Kudlow

With financial markets across the globe plummeting in response to coronavirus, the White House’s top economic adviser on Monday appeared on CNBC to downplay the CDC’s warning before offering a rosy view of coronavirus’ economic effects. “The business and the economic side, I don’t think it’s going to be an economic tragedy at all.” As for the chances of a wider outbreak in the United States, Kudlow asserted, “We have contained this, I won’t say airtight but pretty close to airtight.”

Relying on Kudlow to pacify a spooked market is perplexing. Prior to joining the Trump administration, Kudlow was infamous for his extremely wrong financial predictions. “There’s no recession coming,” Kudlow said in December 2007, just one month before the Great Recession started. “The pessimists were wrong. At a bare minimum, we’re looking at Goldilocks 2.0.”

Donald Trump

Then, of course, there’s the president himself. Trump has an impressive portfolio, with decades of science-denial, a presidency in many ways defined by dismantling Obamacare and Planned Parenthood, and budget proposals aimed at dramatically slashing global health policies. He has even repeatedly claimed, falsely, that vaccines cause autism. It’s hard to imagine someone less-suited to confront the coronavirus threat.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate