The US Has No Decent Paid Sick Leave Policy. This Bill Attempts to Change That.

When workers have to choose between getting paid or not spreading infectious diseases.

Chef preparing vine tomatoes, Antigua, Guatemala, Joe Schmelzer/Cultura Exclusive via Getty

The coronavirus is a rapidly developing news story, so some of the content in this article might be out of date. Check out our most recent coverage of the coronavirus crisis, and subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

As the coronavirus continues to spread to more communities in the United States, the Centers for Disease Control has warned workers to stay home if they are feeling sick. The CDC recommended that employers “actively encourage sick employees to stay home” and maintain flexible policies about the use of sick leave and working from home. It also urged employees who are sick to stay home and notify their employers. That is all crucial advice for curbing the spread of the epidemic, but unrealistic for many Americans working in nursing homes, in restaurants, or as contractors who lack paid sick leave and for whom just staying home isn’t an option. On Friday, Democrats in the House and Senate introduced legislation aimed at allowing workers to use sick leave in health emergencies, which includes the recent global outbreak of coronavirus.

The bill introduced by Democratic Senator Patty Murray of Washington State, where the virus has already killed 11 residents, and Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), would require “all employers” to let workers earn 7 days of paid sick leave a year, and give them 14 paid sick days immediately in the event of a health emergency. The bill does not include contractors in the gig economy. It would also ensure that workers could use sick leave when school are closed due to a “public health emergency.” Or if they or one of their family members is quarantined or isolated.  

For many workers in the United States even accessing paid sick leave can be an uphill battle. Currently more than half of workers in leisure and hospitality industries—such as restaurant and hotel workers—do not have access to any paid sick leave at all. This means that people who interact the most with food, lodging, and other human beings, are being forced to choose between potentially spreading infectious diseases or putting themselves and their livelihoods at risk.

Service industry employees who work part-time and other part-time employees are at even more of a risk of not having paid sick leave. Roughly 60 percent of part-time workers in other industries do not receive paid sick leave. And, for contractors rather than employees in the gig economy,  ride-share drivers and delivery workers who get paid directly for their services, going days without getting paid is often not an option. This bill does not specifically address this population since many people in those industries work as contractors rather than as employees.

As cases of the coronavirus continue to rise, with more than 230 confirmed cases and 12 confirmed deaths in the United States, and 100,000 confirmed cases worldwide, the World Health Organization has said that the time to act to prevent the spread of the virus is now. The United States, is one of few wealthy countries in the world to not offer guaranteed paid sick leave for employees. Italy which has roughly 4,000 confirmed cases of coronavirus, mandates that employers offer at least 3 sick days. 

“The lack of paid sick days could make coronavirus harder to contain in the United States compared with other countries that have universal sick leave policies in place,” said Congresswoman DeLauro in a statement. “No one should face the impossible choice of caring for their health or keeping their paycheck or job.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate