Day Cares Are Open for Business Amid Surging Cases of COVID-19. It’s a Terrible Idea.

But not totally their fault.

From far left to right, Victor Bibbs, 26, and his daughters, Kavaya Bibbs, 4, and Zi'yona Calkins, 7, use hand sanitizer as YMCA child care employee April Moskalczyk holds 2-year-old Zavaya Bibbs, having her temperature taken, in Erie, Pennsylvania.AP

The coronavirus is a rapidly developing news story, so some of the content in this article might be out of date. Check out our most recent coverage of the coronavirus crisis, and subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

A month ago, my 4-year-old’s day care closed to slow the spread of the novel coronavirus. Upon hearing this news, I did not exactly jump for joy. How on earth would my husband and I entertain him and our 1-year-old daughter all day while also doing our full-time jobs? But we knew our beloved day care had made the right decision, doing its part to flatten the curve. We explained to our 4-year-old that school was closed, that his teachers and friends were staying home, too, to make sure everyone stayed healthy. Someday, we told him, he would be able to go back to school—but not just yet.

We were just settling into the daily bedlam when, at the end of March, the day care management sent us an email with an announcement: They planned to reopen in April—right when cases of coronavirus in our home state of Georgia and other parts of the country were expected to peak. We were confused, especially considering public schools in Atlanta, where we live, will be closed for the rest of the year. I asked around and found out that our day care isn’t the only one reopening—several others have already done so. 

When I emailed our day care’s management to ask how they decided to reopen and what their plans were once they did, they assured me that the state agency in charge of day cares said it was entirely safe. They would adhere strictly to the state’s rules, which would ensure a secure environment for the kids and the staff. I was curious about the rules, so I followed the link in the email to the state of Georgia’s FAQ about how Gov. Brian Kemp’s shelter-in-place order applies to day cares.

It turned out, the “rules” are more like vague guidelines. The only actual requirement is that classrooms must be separated by full walls, and that class size must be capped at 10 students. The guidance explains that this number of students is in keeping with the shelter-in-place rule that allows gatherings of 10 people or fewer, as long as the participants stayed 6 feet apart. Good luck, I thought: As any parent can attest, babies and toddlers are not exactly known for their ability to respect personal boundaries. The idea of keeping 10 crawling 1-year-olds or rambunctious 4-year-olds from hugging, bumping up against, or licking each other seems well nigh impossible, let alone keeping them 6 feet apart.

Beyond the 10-student limit, the guidance offers a few more recommendations: Day cares should limit the number of staff that interact with each classroom and continue “basic health and safety practices such as handwashing and cleaning and disinfecting surfaces that could possibly pose a risk to children and teachers.” As a precautionary measure, it says, day cares might institute “daily temperature checks on visitors and children”—despite abundant evidence that people can transmit the virus days or even weeks before they show symptoms. 

What happens should there be a case of COVID-19 at a day care? Unfortunately, there aren’t any real rules about what to do—just a suggestion that management contact the public health department.

If Georgia’s guidelines for day cares seem loose and arbitrary, well, it’s because they are. The Hunt Institute, an education research group, tracks states’ policies for day cares during COVID-19 and found that they vary widely. Some states—including Massachusetts, Ohio, and Oregon—have closed all day cares, with a few exceptions for children of first responders. Other states—Georgia, Iowa, and Louisiana, among others—allow day cares to remain open with limits on the number of children per classroom—in some states it’s 10; in others it’s 11 or 12. Some states—including New York and Alaska—have no rules at all: Day cares can remain open as usual, if they choose. In general, those rules don’t line up with the guidelines for K-12 schools. Many of the states where day cares are allowed to operate as usual—New Mexico, for instance—have closed public schools for the rest of the academic year.   

The discrepancy between public school and day care closures bugs Aaron Carroll, a University of Indiana pediatrician who recently wrote about school closures in the New York Times. “There is no reason to believe day care is less of a risk than school— it’s probably more of a risk,” he told me. That’s because there’s evidence that coronavirus spreads through feces, so diaper changes are an added danger. Keeping day cares open, he said, “could lead to a nightmare scenario.” Columbia University virologist Angela Rasmussen echoed his concerns. She wrote to me in an email, “Limiting class sizes to 10 won’t be effective in stopping spread, since children are much less likely to be compliant with physical distancing.”

My family is lucky: We can keep our kids home. But what about first responders like doctors, nurses, health care workers, law enforcement, and even grocery store workers? Creative people are devising plans to provide care while minimizing risk: In Minnesota, for example, medical students have organized a network of 350 volunteers to take care of first responders’ children. The model is quickly spreading to other states.

But a couple of hundred volunteers aren’t going to be able to meet the overwhelming need for child care—which is why, Carroll said, a robust pandemic preparedness plan must include a safe option for the hundreds of thousands of children of first responders. The fact that there is none—and that day cares are left to make their own decisions—is a profound failure on the part of state and national leaders, he said. “We’re a several months into this, and we still don’t have a plan for first responders,” he told me. “We desperately need one.” 

When I first heard that our day care had decided to reopen, I was furious. There seemed to be no question that this decision would put children, teachers, and our neighborhood at risk. But the more I thought about it, the more I saw what an impossible position they were in: If they stayed closed, no one would help those who needed help the most get through this mess. The federal government bailed out the airlines—where were the billions of dollars to keep struggling day cares afloat?

At the very least, they need science-based rules that will allow them to reopen safely. Our day care teachers excel at their job: feeding, nurturing, and teaching our children while we’re at work. But fending off a novel virus has never been part of the job description. Without strong leadership informed by public health science, they’re flying blind—and our entire community could pay the price.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate