It Started Out As a Blog for Doctors. Now It’s a Time Capsule of the Coronavirus Era.

“This is unlike anything we’ve ever seen in our lifetimes. Take it seriously.”

kupicoo/ Getty Images

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A few months ago, KevinMD.com was full of the kinds of by-doctors-for-doctors blog posts that had been the staple of the site since an internist named Dr. Kevin Pho started it in 2004, when he set out to create a place for doctors, nurses, and medical students to share their perspectives on everything from health care policy to physician burnout.

Then the coronavirus pandemic broke out. Now, as people anxiously turn to doctors for guidance on how to stay safe, everyone from the nationā€™s top doc to physicians in far-flung communities found themselves thrust into the spotlight. And KevinMD, the place where doctors gathered to figure this all out among themselves, suddenly had a much bigger platform.  

ā€œWhen [the virus] first came out, we were getting 50 to 60 times normal traffic,ā€ said Pho, who still works full-time at a hospital in Nashua, New Hampshire. He reviews submissions and updates the site in his spare time, which in the past meant working on three to four posts per day. Now, itā€™s upwards of 10 per day.

Pho knew something had shifted in mid-March when a post titled ā€œA COVID-19 coronavirus update from concerned physiciansā€ got more than 2 million shares on social media. That post is exemplary of the type of message that’s taken hold of the site now: PSAs that echo the guidance of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and essentially plead with the public to stay home and do what they can to stop the spread of COVID-19. It was published by a group of six doctors on March 14, just when US public consciousness about the virus was reaching its tipping point. ā€œMany of you are very nervous,ā€ the article states in a calm, authoritative voice. ā€œAs physician leaders, we felt it was important to craft a resource you can rely on as being scientifically accurate.ā€

But another, more visceral, kind of story has also been gaining traction: first-hand dispatches from medical practitioners on the front lines. These storiesā€”describing hospitals with waning supplies of personal protection equipment and doctorsā€™ fears for their own lives and those of their coworkersā€”similarly end in appeals to not forget them or take them for granted. The site is now filled with headlines like, “It’s scary as hell to be a doctor right now” and “We are not expendable. We are not replaceable.” 

Nasir Malim, an internal medicine resident in New York City, wrote a vivid minute-by-minute account of one night working in the medical ICU of a hospital at the epicenter of the crisis. He recounts the experience of trying to work past his own anxiety to even begin his shift, only to be confronted by patient after patient sedated and on a ventilator: 

There is a young patient who is on a breathing machine though his body is still struggling to get enough oxygen despite this. We are nearing the end of medical options that can help him improve. We decide to prone him, but before doing so, I try some osteopathic manipulative therapy a doctor friend showed me from a clinical trial. There are no more medicines to try, so I decide to try whatever I can offer with my hands. My desire to preserve life as a doctor is somehow overcoming my fear. I see the beads of sweat running down his face, almost as though each bead is timing the duration of my therapy. Other doctors and nursing staff join me to help flip him over safely. As we finish I notice the TV on in the corner with CNN playing, Anderson Cooper is talking about how today was the deadliest day from COVID in the country to date with over 500 deaths. I return my gaze back at the 29-year-old in front of me; he is my exact age.

“The people that we had in that ICU were those with the best chance to make it,” Malim told me. “They were young people without any other medical problems. So getting those people the best type of care that we can offer in the hospital, to give them the best chance of survival, and then realizing as a doctor that you still have nothing in your toolbox that can affect them. It was traumatic.”

Malim says he wrote the piece to give people outside the medical world insight into the psychological battle that doctors and nurses are enduring right now. He especially wanted to give voice to the experience of medical residents, who often put in longer hours for much less money than more senior physicians. 

KevinMD.com has also tracked the evolving opinions about the coronavirus within the medical community. A confessional written by Jenny Hartsock, a hospitalist in Oregon, titled “I thought COVID-19 was overblown. I was wrong” was shared more than 30,000 times. Hartsock and her friends in the medical community initially saw the virus as another H1N1 or SARS and adopted a “been there, done that” attitude. But her mind was changed by the harrowing reports coming out of Italy. “The response to this virus in the U.S. has been varied and haphazard,” Hartsock laments.  “Why does this matter? It matters because we missed many early cases. It matters because we are still missing them.” 

Pho hopes that the increased attention to his site will make more people aware of all the ways that doctors and nurses are especially vulnerable during the pandemic. A spate of recent posts, for example, tell of the financial impact that this can have on physicians. Many doctors are also small businesses owners, Dr. Nisha Mehta reminds us in one post, and independent practices may not withstand temporary closures. Another suggests that doctors are at greater risk of being sued, citing anecdotal evidence from one Illinois law firm ā€œencouragingā€ such litigation. The chorus of physicians on KevinMD is currently united in one message: We are here to help you through this pandemic, but we are scared, too.

ā€œIā€™m hearing a lot from physician parentsā€”parents who are both physicians and on the front linesā€”and they have young kids themselves at home,ā€ Pho said. ā€œTheyā€™re paying attention to their wills, because whoā€™s going to be taking care of these children should these physicians on the front lines get sick?ā€

Battling the pandemic will be a communal effort, Pho told me, requiring coordinated national policy and personal sacrifice. “This is unlike anything we’ve ever seen in our lifetimes,” he said. “Take it seriously.ā€ 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate