Trump Declares War on Watchdogs

Amid a pandemic, the president is undermining oversight.

Alex Brandon/AP

The coronavirus is a rapidly developing news story, so some of the content in this article might be out of date. Check out our most recent coverage of the coronavirus crisis, and subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

In the midst of a pandemic, Donald Trump is working hard to avoid facing independent oversight.

On Tuesday, the president ousted Glenn Fine, a respected former Justice Department inspector general, from his role as chair of the new Pandemic Response Accountability Committee that Congress created to oversee $2 trillion in emergency funding aimed at propping up the economy during the coronavirus pandemic. The White House used a bureaucratic maneuver to remove Fine, who was serving as acting Defense Department inspector general. By replacing Fine in his Pentagon job, and demoting him to be the department’s principal deputy inspector general, Trump removed him from eligibility to chair the new panel. (Fine’s replacement as acting Defense Department watchdog is EPA Inspector General Sean O’Donnell, who is now tasked with overseeing both high profile agencies, a Pentagon spokesperson said.)

This was just the latest in a series of recent steps by Trump aimed at restricting the power of nonpartisan officials to oversee his administration. 

“President Trump is abusing the coronavirus pandemic to eliminate honest and independent public servants because they are willing to speak truth to power and because he is so clearly afraid of strong oversight,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday.

House Armed Services Chairman Adam Smith (D-Wash.) told reporters Tuesday that he is “very concerned” about the state of independent oversight under Trump. “What he cares about is people kissing his ass,” Smith said. “Whether the job gets done is secondary.”

Trump’s move to sideline Fine came after the president’s earlier declaration that he may not abide by a provision in the recent stimulus bill giving the chairman of the accountability committee power to demand information from executive branch agencies on how they are spending funds, and requiring the IG to report any agency refusal to comply to Congress “without delay.”

In a signing statement released after he signed the bill, Trump asserted the right to bar the IG from reporting to Congress. “I do not understand, and my administration will not treat, this provision as permitting the [new Inspector General] to issue reports to the Congress without the presidential supervision required” by the Constitution, the signing statement said.

Trump has also drawn criticism for picking Brian Miller, a White House lawyer, for a separate new inspector general post overseeing a $500 billion coronavirus relief fund housed in the Treasury Department. Although Miller previously served as inspector general of the General Services Administration and won praise from some oversight advocates for his work there, critics argue his recent work in a White House Counsel’s office that has attempted to stonewall all congressional oversight of Trump disqualifies him for the post.

Trump has recently launched other attacks on government watchdogs. When asked by reporters Monday about a report by the inspector general of the Health and Human Services Department detailing severe shortages of coronavirus testing capabilities at hospitals around the country, Trump ranted at one reporter and disputed the findings by falsely claiming HHS principal deputy inspector general Christi Grimm, who has worked in HHS since 1999, was an Obama administration holdover. This testing shortage has been widely reported on, and the report was based on a survey of hundreds of US hospitals.

On Friday, Trump abruptly removed Michael Atkinson as Intelligence Community Inspector General. In an extraordinary admission during a press conference Saturday, Trump indicated that he fired Atkinson as retaliation for the watchdog’s role informing Congress of a whistleblower report detailing Trump’s effort last year to coerce Ukraine into producing dirt on his political opponents. “He took a fake report and he brought it to Congress,” Trump said, ignoring the reality that the complaint was shown to be accurate by a slew of witnesses who testified before the House of Representatives, and that Atkinson was legally required to inform lawmakers of its existence. 

At least one congressional committee is looking into whether Atkinson’s ouster, in addition to addressing Trump’s craving for revenge, also aimed to thwart ongoing probes by the IG’s office. In a letter Tuesday to Richard Grenell, Trump’s acting director of national intelligence, House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said his panel “is reviewing whether [Atkinson’s] termination was intended to curb any ongoing investigations or reviews being undertaken by his office.”

Dan Spinelli contributed reporting.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate