Trump’s Defense Chief Says He’s Against Invoking Insurrection Act in Break With Trump

The head of the Pentagon doesn’t want to have active-duty troops policing protests.

Shealah Craighead/White House

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Defense Secretary Mark Esper, in a public press conference from the Pentagon Wednesday morning, said he does “not support invoking the Insurrection Act,” breaking with Donald Trump, who threatened Monday night to use the 1807 law as a way to have the military crack down on protesters nationwide.

Deploying active-duty troops “should only be used as a matter of last resort and only in the most urgent and dire situations,” Esper said, adding that “we are not in one of those situations now.”

The Pentagon’s civilian leader has been in the news over the last 48 hours for his role in Trump’s decision to stage a controversial photo op on Monday at a church near the the White House. Peaceful protesters who were gathered along the path were attacked with tear gas and rubber bullets to make way for Trump’s entourage. Reports emerged that DC National Guard members, in addition to the US Secret Service and Park Police, were tasked with the assault on the protesters, but Esper denied the group’s involvement. As for his own role, Esper said he went to the White House expecting to check in on Guard units, which is the same flimsy excuse Joint Chiefs Chair Mark Milley provided for his presence, only a day after Esper told NBC News that he thought they were going to look at a “vandalized bathroom” in Lafayette Square. 

On Wednesday, Esper said he knew Trump wanted to go the church, but said he “did not know a photo op was happening.” As for the controversial plan to clear the park, which the Washington Post reported was due to Attorney General William Barr’s order, Esper said he “was not aware of law enforcement’s plans for the park or briefed on them.”

In recent days, Trump has openly mulled the benefit of using the military as a bulwark against protesters. Esper might have said he disagrees with that strategy, but he may not ultimately have a choice. On Monday, a National Guard medical helicopter was spotted flying close to the ground in what onlookers described as a menacing attempt to disperse protesters, a maneuver known as a “show of force” that the military has used in international combat zones but not meant to happen in a domestic policing context. Esper said Wednesday that he opened an investigation into the incident after confirming it was a military helicopter, but strained credulity by telling reporters he believed it was only out to observe a Guard checkpoint. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate