The White House Says Trump Was Offended by Romney’s 47-Percent Remark. That’s a Lie.

Trump defended the comments in 2012—and echoed them three years later.

trump romney

Donald Trump endorsing Mitt Romney in 2012.Julie Jacobson/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Mitt Romney appears to have gotten under Donald Trump’s skin—and, as so often happens, the Trump White House is reacting by lying, this time about Romney’s most infamous quote.

On Sunday, Romney, the GOP’s 2012 presidential nominee who is now a senator from Utah, joined a Black Lives Matter protest in Washington, DC. A video of him trekking along with other demonstrators has drawn more than 10 million views.

Naturally, the next day, White House mouthpiece Kayleigh McEnany was asked about Romney’s moment of resistance and whether Trump agreed with Romney’s support of “the core message of Black Lives Matter.” She was well prepped for the question and quickly pounced. President Trump, she said, “won 8 percent of the black vote; Mitt Romney won 2 percent of the black vote.” And she pivoted to Romney’s 47-percent quote, a story broken by Mother Jones in 2012. She declared that “Mitt Romney has a lot of words,” and, reading from her notes, she reminded people that Romney had said that 47 percent of Americans are “dependent upon government, believe they are victims, believe the government has a responsibility to care for them.” She continued, “The president takes great offense to those words.”

But that was false. Trump did not take offense. And he has even endorsed the message that half of Americans are ne’er-do-well free-riders. 

During the 47-percent controversy, Trump adopted a clear stand: Romney had said nothing wrong. In an interview with CNN, Trump defended Romney and said it was an issue that deserved debate. “I don’t think he should be apologizing,” Trump said, adding that “it’s a point of view, and it’s probably something that they have to have out.” He also criticized the media for making “a big deal out of it.” 

Trump tweeted the same, telling Romney to “stay on offense” and not apologize.

So Trump was not upset by Romney’s comment.

Fast forward three years: Trump, now a presidential candidate, picked up this Romney torch. During a 2015 interview on Fox News, Sean Hannity asked Trump if he could lift low-income Americans out of poverty. Of course, he could, Trump replied. He then remarked:

The problem we have right now—we have a society that sits back and says we don’t have to do anything. Eventually, the 50 percent cannot carry—and it’s unfair to them—but cannot carry the other 50 percent. 

In a briefer and more direct fashion, Trump had reiterated what Romney said. He even added three more percentage points. Half of Americans, according to Trump, were freeloaders who expected to be carried by the other half. Trump’s comment at the time did not cause a fuss. It was just one of the gazillions of outrageous and false statements he was tossing out on the campaign trail. But it was fully in sync with the conservative talking point (expressed by Romney in 2012) that the world is divided into makers and takers and that many Americans are social parasites.

It’s no shocker, but McEnany, who not long ago promised never to lie to the media and the public, lied about all this. Trump was not offended by Romney’s 47-percent comment. He advised Romney to stand his ground and not apologize. (Romney, whose campaign book was titled No Apology, did apologize.) And Trump even expressed the same haughty and elitist view of the American people. The only difference is that his estimate of number of Americans he considered irresponsible free-riders was higher. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate