This Is What the Presidential Race Looked Like Exactly Four Years Ago Today

Thought you should know.

iStock/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Polls can be a finicky thing. They’re not “fake,” as President Donald Trump regularly suggests, but you also shouldn’t go crazy every time you see one, like that one dog on your block who yaps anytime someone comes within 50 feet of their door. But if you are going to read polls, there are some basics to know. If you’re trying to figure out the state of play, two polls are better than one poll, and three polls are better than two. By the same token, if you poll the same race enough times, you’re likely to come up with some notable outliers now and then.

With that in mind, here’s an astounding statistic: there have been 98 reputable national polls of the presidential race since late February, according to Real Clear Politics‘ tracker, and Joe Biden has not trailed in a single one. He has led in 96. He has been tied in two. The last time Trump led in a single national poll was an Emerson College survey in February, exactly 99 polls ago. The Democratic primary was still going on; the same poll showed Bernie Sanders in front and Michael Bloomberg rising.

That national trend is backed up at the state level. RCP‘s averages put Biden in the lead in four of the five Midwestern swing states Democrats lost four years ago (Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Ohio), as well as in Arizona and North Carolina. Texas and Georgia are close. The extent of the bad electoral news for Democrats? Maine’s second congressional district, where voters independently determine an electoral college delegate, is still leaning red.

And yet…if it feels like we’ve been here before, it’s because we have. Here, for your consideration, is the FiveThirtyEight forecast from August 8, 2016—exactly four years ago today:

cursed map
FiveThirtyEight

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back in high school we had a game called “the game.” The way the game worked was that if you remembered that you were playing the game, you lost, and would have to say out loud “I just lost the game.” And then everyone else who heard you—if they were also playing the game—would shake their head and admit that they, too, just lost the game. Incredibly dumb stuff. Not surprisingly, the British invented it. But it’s also sort of how I think about the 2016 election: Every now and then, I remember that it happened, and then you have to remember it too.

With that map—eerily similar to Biden’s at the moment—Clinton looked practically invincible; Trump wasn’t simply on the verge of losing, he was on the verge of getting crushed. And of course, he didn’t. The circumstances were a bit different; both conventions had just wrapped up, and Clinton had received a sizable bump from hers. This year the conventions have not happened, and when they do, they’ll be virtual. And Biden hasn’t even announced a running mate yet. But something like Biden’s map was sustained by a healthy Clinton lead for very long stretches of 2016, up until it wasn’t.

Right now, all the conditions are in place for a wave. But first come the longest three months of your life.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate