There’s a 350-Foot Statue of Columbus in Puerto Rico. Indigenous People Want It Gone.

It’s the tallest sculpture in North America, and locals say it’s “an embarrassment.”

A month after George Floyd's death, solidarity protests in San Juan, Puerto Rico targeted colonial statues and place names.Ira L. Black/Corbis/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

If all the sculptures in North America got together for a party, only one would stand taller than Lady Liberty’s torch: Christopher Columbus on a three-sailed ship, wrought in bronze. Clocking in at 6,500 tons with a height of 350 feet, the “Birth of the New World” has 45 feet on the Statue of Liberty, and like her, presides over a kind of port of entry: the shores of Puerto Rico, one of the first places Columbus and other Spaniards made landfall in their conquest of the so-called “New World.”

It’s an unlikely place for the giant sculpture. Though 76 percent of the island’s residents identify as “white,” studies show that most Puerto Ricans have varying degrees of Taíno ancestry, meaning they are descended from the Native people Columbus and his men enslaved and killed. And on the eve of Indigenous People’s Day, in a year when monuments to colonizers have fallen left and right, some Puerto Ricans are renewing their call for this one to be dismantled.

“The statue is really a tribute to genocide, colonialism, religious intolerance, racism, gender violence, and white supremacy,” says R. Múkaro Borrero, president of the United Confederation of Taíno People (UCTP). “There are mixed feelings among locals, but Taíno and other Indigenous peoples of Borikén [an Indigenous name for the island] would like to see it gone, as it is looked upon as an embarrassment.”

Tania Gonzalez, a University of Puerto Rico medical student of mixed European, African, and Indigenous descent, says she and her friends find the monument “ugly and unnecessary.” She used to see it regularly from the highway when visiting her dad in Arecibo. “It was an eyesore,” she says. “I think it’s sad that people in a colony are educated to idolize colonizers, to the point where they’re inspired to erect a statue to honor one.”

The hulking bronze Columbus and his ship landed in Arecibo after six US cities chose to give it a wide berth.The sculpture was created by Russian artist Zurab Tsereteli, whose similar and widely reviled monument to Peter the Great has reportedly only stayed standing in Moscow thanks to Tsereteli’s coziness with Russian elites. He intended to gift the Columbus monument to the US mainland, but in the 90s,New York, Miami, Fort Lauderdale, Baltimore, Columbus, and St. Petersburg all rejected offers to host it. (The sculptor also created a 150-foot-tall egg-shaped Columbus statue that stands in Seville, Spain.)

Tsereteli’s hopes of erecting “Birth of the New World” in New York City were briefly revived in 1997, when Donald Trump sought a deal to secure it for his West Side Yards development. “This man is major and legit,” Trump said of Tsereteli, but then-mayor Rudy Giuliani and other city leaders nixed plans to accept the sculpture.

In 1998, Tsereteli began talks to erect it in the Puerto Rican city of Cataño, 50 miles down the coast from Arecibo. Alongside other Indigenous groups like El Movimiento Indígena Jíbaro Boricua, the UCTP has been fighting “Birth of the New World” ever since, filing petitions, writing letters, and meeting with local politicians who have proven unsympathetic to their pleas.

Borrero adds that the continued suffering from Hurricane Maria, recent earthquakes, and the COVID-19 crisis didn’t stop his community from marching through San Juan, the island’s capital, to protest colonial monuments (including plaza and street names) during the nationwide uprisings back in July. Building on that momentum, the UCTP recently launched a community survey to poll Puerto Ricans on their support for removing Columbus statues and changing “Columbus Day” to “Indigenous People’s Day.” They’re also working to build more statues of Indigenous people, such as those which already exist in cities like Cataño and Isabela.

City leaders say that since its installation in 2017, “Birth of the New World” has boosted tourism. Arecibo Mayor Carlos Molina credits it with attracting enough visitors to open 100 local businesses that have created 1,000 jobs as of 2020, and last year, the Senate of Puerto Rico passed a measure ordering island transit authorities to look into creating a highway rest area overlooking the monument.

But local opponents of the statue say no amount of money can justify its continued existence on their shores. “I hate that statue,” says Santiago Reyes Acosta, who lives in Río Piedras, Puerto Rico and hails from Ecuador. “It’s an absolute insult to any culture of any territory that was at some moment under Spanish imperial rule.”

Gonzalez, the medical student, thinks there are better options for promoting tourism on an island as beautiful and diverse as Puerto Rico. Funding local art projects and natural resource conservation “could’ve provided a more accurate representation of us,” she says. “Our caverns, rivers, beaches, and mountains are much more necessary to uphold than a 400-foot hunk of metal.”

Borrero’s vision is strikingly similar. The Columbus in Arecibo, he says, would be better for Puerto Rican tourism if it were sunk off the coast to create an artificial reef.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate