WH Physician’s Briefing Leaves Serious Questions About When Trump Tested Positive for COVID-19

Dr. Sean Conley said the president is improving. Others in the White House suggest otherwise.

The team of doctors treating President Donald Trump for COVID-19 briefs reporters on the president's condition on October 3, 2020.Rod Lamkey/CNP via ZUMA Wire

The coronavirus is a rapidly developing news story, so some of the content in this article might be out of date. Check out our most recent coverage of the coronavirus crisis, and subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter.

White House physician Sean Conley said they were “extremely happy with the progress the president has made” since President Donald Trump was moved to Walter Reed Medical Center on Friday to be treated for COVID-19. But the briefing he and the team of doctors treating Trump gave on Saturday left a number of unanswered questions as to the precise nature of his condition—and raised others as to whether the White House has been truthful about the timing of Trump’s diagnosis.

One of the most serious questions from the briefing was the way in which Conley’s description of the president’s diagnosis and treatment didn’t match up with what previous official reports had indicated about the timeline of the his condition. Trump tweeted that he and First Lady Melania Trump had tested positive for COVID-19 around 1 a.m. on Friday morning. But Conley said that, as of the briefing on Saturday, the president had been 72 hours into his diagnosis. Another doctor treating Trump who spoke at the briefing said that the president had been administered a Regeneron antibody cocktail, an experimental treatment, 48 hours before, even though a White House press release announced that it had been administered after the president’s positive test—which, according to Conley had occurred on Thursday evening.

Nor would Conley answer when the president had his last negative coronavirus test, saying only that the president had been tested after news that Hope Hicks, the president’s senior aide, had tested positive for the virus on Thursday. He did not indicate the results of any tests potentially administered to the president in advance of Tuesday’s debate against Joe Biden or his Wednesday campaign rally in Minnesota—an appearance that was nearly half as long as his usual events.

According to Conley, Trump has been “fever free” for over 24 hours, and the symptoms the president had—which included shortness of breath and a cough—are “resolving and improving.” His medical team is encouraging him to eat, drink, stay hydrated— “working to do the things he needs to do to get well.” The president reportedly said he felt like he could “walk out of here today,” according to one of the doctors on his team.

But for all the optimism, there have been reports that Trump, in fact, could not “walk out” today. After the press conference, the White House press pool received a quote from “a source familiar with the President’s health” that said Trump’s “vitals over the last 24 hours were very concerning, and the next 48 hours will be critical in terms of his care.” The unnamed source added that he is “still not on a clear path to a full recovery.” (New York‘s Olivia Nuzzi noted that White House chief of staff Mark Meadows was caught on camera asking to brief reporters off-the-record after the press conference was over, but before the anonymous quote was sent out.)

New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman tweeted that two sources had told her Trump’s blood oxygen levels dropped on Friday.

Reporters repeatedly asked Conley if the president was receiving supplemental oxygen, a treatment that typically indicates a worsening condition. Once more, Conley’s answers were evasive. He replied that the president is not currently on oxygen, but he would not confirm that the president never received any supplemental oxygen during the course of his treatment. When pressed for an answer, Conley said, “He was not on oxygen when the team visited him yesterday” at Walter Reed. The AP reported that the president had received supplemental oxygen on Friday, before he was transported to Walter Reed Medical Center. When Conley was asked if the president was receiving steroids, the physician cut off the briefing.

The decision to transport Trump to Walter Reed was announced amidst reports that his condition had been worsening. Conley insisted that moving the president there was “as a precautionary measure” to provide “state-of-the-art monitoring.” The White House said on Saturday morning that the president had begun receiving Remdesivir, an anti-viral medication. Conley said Trump would receive Remdesivir’s full five-day treatment course, as well as additional treatment including Regeneron, zinc, and aspirin.

Neither Regeneron and Remdesivir, nor any other treatments, have been officially approved by the FDA to treat COVID-19. Regeneron is still considered to be an experimental treatment and is in clinical trials. It is administered to patients under the FDA’s “compassionate use” guidelines, which allows doctors to administer such drugs on a case-by-case basis. The company reported in a recent press release that it has been shown to diminish COVID-19 symptoms and reduce a patient’s viral load. Remdesivir recently received the FDA’s emergency authorization for use in severe cases of COVID-19. The decision to give him both treatments so early, according to Conley, was made in the event there was “any possibility it would add value to his care and expedite his recovery.” 

As to when Trump would leave Walter Reed, Conley would not say, noting only that the “first week is the most critical” in determining the severity of the illness. He noted that the “advanced therapies” the president had been given made it difficult to say where he was on the course of recovery. “Every day we’re evaluating ‘Does he need to be here?'” Conley said.

As reporters began to piece together the discrepancies in the timelines provided by Conley and White House, Wall Street Journal reporter Rebecca Ballhaus said a White House official corrected Conley: “He says Conley meant to say it’s Day 3, not 72 hours in—the diagnosis was made Thursday night—and that Garibaldi meant to say it’s been two days, not 48 hours, since the Regeneron was administered on Thursday night,” she tweeted.

But the conflicting information asks the public to choose between the word of a doctor and the word of the White House, neither of whom have demonstrated much openness or credibility regarding the president’s health.

You can watch the full briefing here.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate