Trump’s Refusal to Start the Transition Process Is Crippling America’s Coronavirus Response

“It can’t wait until the last minute.”

President Donald Trump delivers an update on his administration's COVID-19 response at the White House on November 13, 2020.Chris Kleponis/CNP via ZUMA Wire

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The Trump administration’s ongoing refusal to recognize Joe Biden as the election’s legitimate winner and initiate the transition process is endangering the nation’s ability to fight the coronavirus. That was the message delivered Sunday by doctors serving on Biden’s pandemic task force, by Biden’s incoming chief of staff, and even by a Republican governor.

“There is a lot of information that needs to be transmitted,” Atul Gawande, a surgeon and Harvard Medical School professor named to Biden’s team, said on ABC’s This Week. “It can’t wait until the last minute.”

Gawande said that “it is in the national interest” for Biden’s team of experts to have access to the latest coronavirus threat assessments. He added that knowing vaccine distribution plans and the status of mask and gloves supplies would also be crucial for Biden’s planning.

Ron Klain, who was recently named Biden’s White House chief of staff, told NBC’s Chuck Todd that the transition team has had no contact with Anthony Fauci or any of members of the Trump administration’s coronavirus task force.

The key information Biden’s team wants is the status of vaccine distribution plans, Klain added. For now, Biden’s team must rely on the private sector for insights—Klain said Biden is scheduled to meet this week with drug companies such as Pzifer about the status of their vaccine development.

Even Asa Hutchinson, the Republican governor of Arkansas, expressed concerns about the Trump administration’s unwillingness to work with the incoming president. “We want to make sure there is a smooth transition, especially when it comes to the vaccine distribution [and] the coronavirus” so “everybody understands what we’re doing there and what the plan is for the future,” he told Todd.

As his first act as president-elect, Biden appointed an advisory board of doctors and scientists to help him navigate the pandemic, which has reached staggering rates of infection over the last week. Under federal law, the General Services Administration is supposed to provide the president-elect’s transition team—including advisers such as these—with office space, funding to support transition efforts, and, crucially, access to federal agencies and their staff, as well as to daily briefings. The point, of course, is to assure that power is transferred in an orderly manner—something that is even more important during a national health crisis.

But as Trump continues to reject the election’s outcome, GSA administrator Emily Murphy, a Trump appointee, has refused to issue the “letter of ascertainment” that would grant Biden’s transition access to those resources. “We can’t until we get that GSA ascertainment,” Klain said Sunday.

Biden will not take office until January 20, and, as Klain noted, “there’s not much Joe Biden can do right now to change” the nation’s response to the pandemic. But Biden’s medical advisers are recommending measures that scientists have long prescribed, such mask-wearing. Michael Osterholm, an infectious disease expert at the University of Minnesota who was named to Biden’s task force, told Todd that “if we don’t take basic steps like stop swapping air” with people, hospitals will soon reach their breaking point. Biden has called for a nationwide mask mandate.

As the holidays and attendant travel approach, Osterholm called for a nationwide, standardized response on safety measures. Gawande said the advisors are “not in support of a nationwide lockdown” because targeted measures at the local level—including mask-wearing, widespread testing, and capacity restrictions—are sufficient when properly implemented.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate