Joe Biden’s American Fairy Tale

The ambivalent essence of “the soul of the nation.”

Kyle Letendre

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

ā€œI sought this to restore the soul of America,ā€ Joe Biden said on November 7, the day he declared victory. Biden had repeated that phrase, ā€œsoul of America,ā€ time and again on the campaign trail, but he never elaborated much on it. He alluded to it again in Wednesday’s inaugural address, speaking of the imperative “to restore the soul and to secure the future of America.” What did it mean?

Like most matters of the spirit, Americaā€™s soul is a question of faith rather than evidence. But a TV spot from his campaign, titled ā€œSoul of America,ā€ offers some detail. ā€œAmerican history is not a fairy tale,ā€ Biden begins in a campaign ad that manages, by its end, to treat American history as a fable. He reminds us that Thomas Jefferson, author of the Declaration of Independence, was a slaveholder. ā€œWeā€™ve never lived up to our American ideals,ā€ Biden says. Yet as a montage of civil rights triumphs flickers across the screenā€”Jesse Owens crossing a finish line, Rosa Parks addressing a crowdā€”Biden insists that Jeffersonā€™s words have ā€œpulled us towards justiceā€ ever since. Trumpā€™s reelection, though, would ā€œfundamentally alter the character of this nation.ā€

The spotā€™s unusual bluntness about US history almost hid its basic incoherence: If ā€œthe character of this nationā€ is so enduring, how could it survive Stonewall Jackson, George Wallace, and, yes, Thomas Jefferson but perish at the hands of a huckster like Donald Trump? And if the threat is so acute, why should we trust the most moderate candidate in the race to rescue it? Doesnā€™t salvation require something more? The author and Biden speechwriter Jon Meacham, author of a 2018 book entitled The Soul of Americatold the New York Times that the fight for the countryā€™s soul is ultimately about providing a sense of stability. Voters ā€œjust want somebody to run the damn thing with a modicum of efficiency and sanity.ā€ We are not exactly in Sermon on the Mount territory here.

The ambivalent invocation of the American soul is nothing new. In 1932, a University of Pennsylvania English professor named Arthur Hobson Quinn wrote a paean to the national character, titled The Soul of America. Quinnā€™s was an uplifting book, written to counter the pessimism taking hold in the Great Depression. A reviewer in the New York Times praised Quinnā€™s ā€œcalm, serene-eyed surety…a very pleasant quality after the gleeful hullaballoo some of the younger-generation writers have raised over what they are sure have been our failures and disgraces and general incompetence.ā€ Itā€™s hard not to think here of our own eraā€™s ā€œyounger-generationā€ voters and their dissatisfaction with the calm-eyed surety of leading Democrats.

A more radical approach treats the Christian metaphor of the soul as something that must be redeemed from disgrace rather than restored to glory. The Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the civil rights organization, was chartered in 1957 under the slogan ā€œredeeming the soul of America.ā€ In 1971, an anti-war Episcopal bishop, Paul Moore, said the ā€œsoul of Americaā€ was corrupted by the ā€œmoral depravityā€ of Vietnam. This treatment of the American soul is less abstract, more searing. This soul rots from the outside in, and our sinsā€”Jim Crow, a cruel foreign war, povertyā€”corrupt us.

To most politicians, though, the soul of America is good and enduring. Faith in it is righteous. Ronald Reagan spoke triumphantly of ā€œa revolution of spirit that taps the soul of Americaā€ in a 1985 State of the Union address; Bill Clinton invoked it soberly after the 1999 Columbine shootings, which he said had ā€œpierced the soul of America.ā€ Like the Puritan settlers who invariably interpreted bountiful harvests as evidence of Godā€™s favor and famines as one of His loving tests, American politicians tend to look into the soul of the country and find themselves affirmed by whatever they see.

Bidenā€™s use of the phrase is unique in that it straddles the line ambiguously between restoration and redemption. But the problem with his presidential metaphysics is that it demands so little of us. To restore the soul of the nation, vote for the former vice president. North Carolinaā€™s Reverend William J. Barber II, a leader of the Poor Peopleā€™s Campaign, recently told Adam Harris in the Atlantic that a countryā€™s ā€œsoulā€ cannot just remain a matter of spiritual malaise. ā€œIf it does not produce a quarrel with the world, then the claim to be spiritual is suspect,ā€ he said.

Throughout the campaign it was never clear what new quarrels Bidenā€™s call for restoration was starting. His inaugural address, in which he used the word ā€œsoulā€ five times, offered the beginnings of an answer: ā€œI ask every American to join me in this cause. Uniting to fight the common foes we face: anger, resentment, hatred. Extremism, lawlessness, violence. Disease, joblessness, hopelessness.ā€ We have defeated these enemies before, in Bidenā€™s telling. ā€œOur better angels have always prevailed,ā€ he said, drawing once again on our more virtuous past, on a heroic national character that can repair the disappointments of the present. Rather than the repudiation it seems to be, the call to restore the soul of America is more of a mirror image of another slogan from our recent history: Make America great again.

John Patrick Leary is the author of Keywords: The New Language of Capitalism.
 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate