Murder, Heart Attacks, Suicide, COVID—Immigrants Are Dying in “America’s Waiting Room”

“There are lots of different ways that our immigration system kills immigrants.”

Mother Jones illustration; Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In 2015, Austin Kocher, who studies immigration enforcement and the courts as a research associate professor at Syracuse University’s Transactional Research Access Clearinghouse, was at a taco stand in Columbus, Ohio. He noticed a small jar next to a picture of a teenage boy from Central America who had passed away. The boy’s family was raising money to take his remains back home, and Kocher began to realize what a logistical nightmare the family faced, on top of their loss and grief.

“It’s hard enough crossing the border when you’re alive,” he says. “Imagine crossing the border with a body that is not.”

Six years later, the Arizona-based humanitarian group No More Deaths released a report that focused on how the Border Patrol’s lax response to emergency calls along the southern border often has left migrants in the desert to disappear or die. Kocher read the damning account, titled Left to Die, and discovered that the agency had failed to conduct searches or rescue operations for 63 percent of all emergency requests, which the researchers attribute to “systemic and deadly discrimination.” 

The February report that focused on the Border Patrol got Kocher thinking more generally about deaths among immigrants while they waited for their hearings. Or, as he says, “how the government plays a role in letting people die simply by doing nothing.” It also made him reflect on all the ways migration and death intersect. “It’s not just the kind of spectacular death that happens at the borders and deserts,” Kocher says, “but the everyday, mundane things too.” So, on February 5, he tweeted a troubling question for immigration lawyers: “How many of you have had a client die while still in the immigration system in some way?”

He was curious about immigrants dying while waiting for paperwork—from asylum to citizenship applications—to be processed in what he describes as “America’s immigration waiting room.” But he wasn’t sure immigration lawyers would volunteer to share stories, or even if that was a common experience. The 50 or so responses surprised Kocher and offers a window into a dysfunctional and punishing immigration system.

Some of them are also just heartbreaking.

One Houston attorney described a client who was shot and killed at a Christmas Eve party after fleeing violence back home and waiting for more than five years for an asylum hearing. Another lawyer based in Los Angeles talked about an LGBTQ asylum seeker who had been detained at California’s Otay Mesa detention center for more than a year. He died of a heart attack right when his appeal was close to being granted.

Lily Axelrod from Tennessee mentioned having several clients with pending cases who died from COVID-19. After having been ordered deported, another client committed suicide. Several other attorneys answered with a “yes” or raised hand emojis. Kocher saw this as an indication that there were many more stories are out there, but they are just not being discussed.

Many of the examples of “death while waiting” that Kocher’s question prompted can’t be directly attributed to the immigration system or the United States government. Motorcycle accidents and terminal illnesses are to blame. These fatalities are not accounted for in immigration statistics. But they evoke a concept known in the social studies field as “slow violence,” a kind of structural harm that happens “gradually and out of sight” and is often hard to assign to a specific perpetrator. 

“If someone has been deported and killed, there definitely is some moral and ethical culpability on the United States for having done that.” Kocher says. “For people who die while they are being processed in the US, the moral and ethical part of it is a lot more ambiguous and nuanced.” 

Brennan Gian-Grasso, a private immigration attorney working on removal defense and family petitions in Philadelphia, hasn’t forgotten how one of his clients became a grim statistic: the city’s first murder of 2011. Another one of his clients was a cab driver and married to a US citizen. After fighting his case for five years, he got shot in the back of the head while at work and died. Others suffered from muscular dystrophy, early onset dementia, and heart diseases. For many, the lengthy wait for immigration relief had to do with decades-old convictions for small crimes like marijuana possession. Gian-Grasso wonders, if his clients had had a more stable immigration status, maybe they wouldn’t have turned to dangerous jobs or found themselves in risky situations. But because of the unforgiving nature of immigration law, his clients, who are often poor and not white, “have to live their lives while it all can be taken away from them.” 

“It radicalizes you in some ways, and you internalize some of the trauma,” he says about the work. “One day you’re fighting for this client, and you get to know them personally. And then one day they’re just gone. It really underscores how unfair and nonsensical the system is—it’s not really a question of justice.” 

The years-long waits for a chance to ask for asylum before an immigration judge or to be reunited with family members raise another question, Kocher says. “What is the dignity of a person’s life when they are trying to get status, and they die in the process through other means?” 

As he reflected on the responses and learned about some stories that usually remain invisible, Kocher realized, “There are lots of different ways that our immigration system kills immigrants, from forcing migrants into the desert, to deporting people back to places where they are hurt or killed, or making people wait and suffer in mental and emotional anguish for years and years for their applications to go through.” If there was one reason that he sent out the tweet, it was because “I want more people to understand how damaging the immigration system is.” 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate